2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12036-017-9466-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooling of Accretion-Heated Neutron Stars

Abstract: We present a brief, observational review about the study of the cooling behaviour of accretion-heated neutron stars and the inferences about the neutron-star crust and core that have been obtained from these studies. Accretion of matter during outbursts can heat the crust out of thermal equilibrium with the core and after the accretion episodes are over, the crust will cool down until crust-core equilibrium is restored. We discuss the observed properties of the crust cooling sources and what has been learned a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
128
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 193 publications
(181 reference statements)
1
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The origin of this shallow heat source is unknown and is important to resolve because the cooling curve can be used to constrain a number of different aspects of crust physics (such as conductivity of the crust and pasta, and the core specific heat; Brown & Cumming 2009;Horowitz et al 2015;Cumming et al 2017). Most systems need ∼1-2 MeV nucleon −1 of shallow heating to explain their cooling curves (e.g., Degenaar et al 2014;Parikh et al 2017;Wijnands et al 2017). The transient NS LMXB MAXI J0556−332 (hereafter J0556) was discovered on 2011 January 11 (Matsumura et al 2011) and exhibited a ∼16 month outburst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin of this shallow heat source is unknown and is important to resolve because the cooling curve can be used to constrain a number of different aspects of crust physics (such as conductivity of the crust and pasta, and the core specific heat; Brown & Cumming 2009;Horowitz et al 2015;Cumming et al 2017). Most systems need ∼1-2 MeV nucleon −1 of shallow heating to explain their cooling curves (e.g., Degenaar et al 2014;Parikh et al 2017;Wijnands et al 2017). The transient NS LMXB MAXI J0556−332 (hereafter J0556) was discovered on 2011 January 11 (Matsumura et al 2011) and exhibited a ∼16 month outburst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For surface temperatures above ∼ 10 6 K and hydrogen columns larger than ∼10 5 g cm −2 , the energy deposited by nuclear burning becomes comparable to and larger than the interior luminosity (see left panel in Figure 3). The hydrogen column densities and surface temperatures where the DNB luminosity becomes non-negligible are in the range inferred from observations of neutron stars in LMXBs after accretion outbursts (see Wijnands et al 2017 for an observational overview). In Figure 4 we show the magnitude of the nuclear burning luminosity for varying hydrogen column (for T s = 1.26 × 10 6 K and T s = 3.16 × 10 6 K) in the top panel, and varying surface temperature in the bottom panel (for y H = 3.16 × 10 4 g cm −2 and y H = 3.16 × 10 6 g cm −2 ).…”
Section: Dnb Luminositymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Sources that intermittently show accretion-powered pulsations provide an independent measure on the difference between the TBO frequency and the spin frequency. These sources show a spin 1 Hz higher than the TBO frequency observed during an X-ray burst (see Casella et al 2008 for detail on Aql X-1, and for HETE J1900.1-2455 see Watts et al 2009). These observations provide a tight constraint on the rotating frame frequency of a buoyant r-mode, which must be as low as 1 Hz.…”
Section: Comparison With Observed Tbo Frequencies and Driftsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Since the work of PB05, a wealth of new models of thermonuclear X-ray bursts have been developed and fitted to bursts from specific sources; these models include a full treatment of the nuclear reactions in the ocean (Heger et al 2007;Keek & Heger 2017;Meisel 2018;Johnston et al 2018Johnston et al , 2019. A new heat source, shallow heating, has been suggested to resolve inconsistencies between observations and the theory needed to explain crust cooling models (for a review see ) and has implications for other phenomena such as short waiting time bursts, superburst recurrence times, and the transition between different burst regimes (Gupta et al 2007;Keek & Heger 2011, 2017. Including these effects can have a marked affect on frequency drift; Chambers et al (2019) calculated buoyant r-modes in a bursting ocean model developed by Keek & Heger (2017) that included both a changing composition and enhanced heat flux from the crust.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%