2000
DOI: 10.1007/s004450050003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooling rates of hyaloclastites: applications of relaxation geospeedometry to undersea volcanic deposits

Abstract: Glass fragments from three different hyaloclastites have been used to evaluate the range of cooling rates experienced by undersea volcanic deposits. We found that the glass fragments retain structures with a range of apparent quench rates from 25 to 0.15 K min -1 . The most rapid cooling rates are interpreted to be those resulting from cooling of the lava near the water interface. Simple conductive cooling models produce a range of quench rates comparable to those of the more rapidly cooled samples. The very s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plastic growth of a limu bubble requires that the melt be kept above the glass transition long enough for the limu bubble to expand or buoyantly escape the melt. Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) studies on the cooling rates (q) of submarine hyaloclastites have returned cooling rates as low as 0.003 K s −1 (Wilding et al 2000), and limu o Pele from Lō`ihi have been shown to be "hyperquenched," with extremely high cooling rates of up to 10 5.31 K/s (Potuzak et al 2008). While the slow end of the range would provide ample time (>> several seconds) for the expansion or escape of a limu bubble, the "hyperquenched" signature suggests that only~1.5×10 −3 s is available to stretch melt into a limu bubble, calculated by (T 2 -T 1 )/q, where T 2 and T 1 are the magmatic (~1,100°C) and approximate glass transition (~800°C) temperatures, respectively.…”
Section: Overcoming Quenchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plastic growth of a limu bubble requires that the melt be kept above the glass transition long enough for the limu bubble to expand or buoyantly escape the melt. Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) studies on the cooling rates (q) of submarine hyaloclastites have returned cooling rates as low as 0.003 K s −1 (Wilding et al 2000), and limu o Pele from Lō`ihi have been shown to be "hyperquenched," with extremely high cooling rates of up to 10 5.31 K/s (Potuzak et al 2008). While the slow end of the range would provide ample time (>> several seconds) for the expansion or escape of a limu bubble, the "hyperquenched" signature suggests that only~1.5×10 −3 s is available to stretch melt into a limu bubble, calculated by (T 2 -T 1 )/q, where T 2 and T 1 are the magmatic (~1,100°C) and approximate glass transition (~800°C) temperatures, respectively.…”
Section: Overcoming Quenchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as discussed above, basaltic melts are more fragile glass formers and are thus more susceptible to structural degradation above the glass transition (Angell, 1985). Wilding et al (2000) compared basaltic hyaloclastite glass before and after calorimetry experiments and found that the thermal treatment did not alter the composition of the glass. However, they found that for some samples the c p of the liquid field was difficult to resolve as a result of decreasing c p owing to the release of latent heat of crystallisation.…”
Section: Sample Changes During Calorimetry Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most previous studies (Wilding et al, 1995(Wilding et al, , 1996(Wilding et al, , 2000(Wilding et al, , 2004Gottsmann and Dingwell, 2001a, 2001bGottsmann et al, 2004) that have calculated the cooling rates of volcanic glass from calorimetry data have used the T-N geospeedometer (Tool, 1946;Narayanaswamy, 1971). This relates c p , or the derivative of enthalpy (DH/DT), to changes in fictive temperature (DT f /DT).…”
Section: Curve Fitting (Tool-narayanaswamy Relaxation Geospeedometer)mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). This technique involves the evaluation of the relaxation process of enthalpy as a geospeedometer using differential scanning calorimetry and has been recently applied to several volcanological/geological problems (Wilding et al 1995(Wilding et al , 1996a(Wilding et al , 1996b(Wilding et al , 2000Gottsmann and Dingwell 2001b) including the analysis of clastogenic phonolite flows on Tenerife, Canary Islands (Gottsmann and Dingwell 2001a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%