2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperation driven by mutations in multi-person Prisoner's Dilemma

Abstract: The n-person Prisoner's Dilemma is a widely used model for populations where individuals interact in groups. The evolutionary stability of populations has been analysed in the literature for the case where mutations in the population may be considered as isolated events. For this case, and assuming simple trigger strategies and many iterations per game, we analyse the rate of convergence to the evolutionarily stable populations. We find that for some values of the payoff parameters of the Prisoner's Dilemma th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we focus on the effect of random exploration and demonstrate that the mutation rate can trigger qualitative changes in the evolutionary dynamics (26)(27)(28)(29)(30). To illustrate how increasing mutation probabilities affect the evolutionary dynamics, we address the evolution of cooperation and punishment in Nplayer public goods games in finite populations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we focus on the effect of random exploration and demonstrate that the mutation rate can trigger qualitative changes in the evolutionary dynamics (26)(27)(28)(29)(30). To illustrate how increasing mutation probabilities affect the evolutionary dynamics, we address the evolution of cooperation and punishment in Nplayer public goods games in finite populations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to other (multiperson) PDs, which only have options C or D (Eriksson and Lindgren, 2005). In the 3-person dependency game, this results in 27 different possible outcomes ((X|Y|Z), with X,Y,Z ∈{D,CL,CR}) ( Table 2).…”
Section: Nash Equilibria In the Dependency Gamementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the classic interpretation of the PD, two players act simultaneously, after which a payoff follows, and this simultaneousness has been retained in multiperson PD games (Boyd and Richerson, 1988;Eriksson and Lindgren, 2005; and references therein). A good example of a simultaneous collaboration is a dyke building project, because all members make their contributions and harvest at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang and PeiHua [4] analyzed the dynamic evolution factors affecting the cooperation or competition mechanism between producers and suppliers in the supply chain through evolutionary game theory, including the initial proportion of the game subject, distribution of benefits, initial investment cost, and discount factor. Eriksson and Lindgren [5] discussed the effect of the game population scale, value of the income parameter, structure of initial scale, and mutation rate on the evolutionary process after analyzing the mechanism of mutation on cooperation, using the prisoner's dilemma model. Based on the analysis of evolution path and the influencing factors of horizontal enterprises, Su et al [6] find that the growth of clusters promotes cooperative network formation, especially among small and medium-sized enterprises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%