2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperation of activating Ras/rtk signal transduction pathway mutations and inactivating myeloid differentiation gene mutations in M0 AML: a study of 45 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, only one of the 26 mutation-harboring cases in our series had changes in two genes, namely case 55 which displayed both a FLT3 and a PTPN11 mutation (Table 1). Previous studies of ALL and AML have shown that concomitant changes in the FLT3, NRAS, KRAS, and PTPN11 genes are rare (Loh et al, 2004;Tartaglia et al, 2005;Roumier et al, 2006;Yamamoto et al, 2006), but this is the first report showing that these mutations generally are mutually exclusive also in high hyperdiploid pediatric ALL. Although it cannot be definitely excluded that coexisting mutations are disadvantageous to the cell, the-albeit few-ALL cases reported with mutations in two genes render this explanation less likely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Interestingly, only one of the 26 mutation-harboring cases in our series had changes in two genes, namely case 55 which displayed both a FLT3 and a PTPN11 mutation (Table 1). Previous studies of ALL and AML have shown that concomitant changes in the FLT3, NRAS, KRAS, and PTPN11 genes are rare (Loh et al, 2004;Tartaglia et al, 2005;Roumier et al, 2006;Yamamoto et al, 2006), but this is the first report showing that these mutations generally are mutually exclusive also in high hyperdiploid pediatric ALL. Although it cannot be definitely excluded that coexisting mutations are disadvantageous to the cell, the-albeit few-ALL cases reported with mutations in two genes render this explanation less likely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Contrary to a study showing a high (23%) frequency of mutation in AML-M0, 37 we and others found no mutations in SPI1. 13,38 It seems that mutations of these transcription factors are not an alternative to RUNX1 mutation in AML-M0. However, as we previously reported, ETV6 mutations are infrequent alternatives to RUNX1 mutation in this cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Other genes found to be mutated in AML-M0 include FLT3, RAS and PTPN11. [10][11][12][13][14] However, these mutations are considered to be, rather than surrogates, collaborating abnormalities with mutations in transcription factors such as RUNX1. 15 In this study we aimed to identify new molecular alterations that could explain the etiology of AML-M0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cooperation between class I mutations and AML1 mutations has also been reported in AML, which supports this hypothesis that mutations affecting AML1 can reproduce those effects. 211,212 The parallel mutational analysis of genes involved in signal transduction pathways (FLT3, RAS, PTPN11) and in myeloid differentiation (AML1, CEBPA) should help clarify this hypothesis. Based on the two-hit model of AML pathogenesis, the frequent association between NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutations argues for a role of NPM1 in hematopoietic differentiation.…”
Section: Gene Mutations In Acute Myeloid Leukemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…209,210 A mechanism of multistep leukemogenesis is in agreement with this hypothesis, particularly in AML, where a combination of events leading to cell proliferation with events leading to block myeloid differentiation (so-called type I mutations and type II mutations, respectively) is strongly suspected. 1,211,212 Due to their prognostic value, the mutational events screening is particularly important in CN-AML patients.…”
Section: Cooperation Between Gene Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%