PsycEXTRA Dataset 2010
DOI: 10.1037/e578852012-003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Driver Acceptance of Following Gap Settings Less Than One Second

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the CACC system, the shortest gap is set at 0.6 seconds. This value has been chosen based on estimates of the separation needed to enable crash avoidance under emergency conditions, as well as previous tests of acceptance by drivers from the general public [24]. The other two available CACC gap settings are 0.9 and 1.1 seconds.…”
Section: Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the CACC system, the shortest gap is set at 0.6 seconds. This value has been chosen based on estimates of the separation needed to enable crash avoidance under emergency conditions, as well as previous tests of acceptance by drivers from the general public [24]. The other two available CACC gap settings are 0.9 and 1.1 seconds.…”
Section: Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous PATH research, a CACC involving two vehicles was tested with very favorable results [23], [24], [6]. Building on that previous work, this paper describes a new control system design and implementation that is integrated in four production vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The control design should yield technically feasible desired acceleration signals and preferably, its performance should meet additional operational specifications: resilient to fluctuations in velocity and spacing errors caused by maneuvers of the leading vehicle like cutting in, cutting out, braking and accelerating; yield continuous desired acceleration signals and operate with a time gap range of (not restricted to) 0.8-2.2 s, which is typically observed in human drivers [17]; it should be locally stable and analyzed for string stability properties to understand the potential impacts on traffic flow. …”
Section: A Design Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fusion of data is mandatory for overcoming the errors from different sensors [18]. These sensors also include the wheel sensors, yaw rate sensors and other motion sensors that are vital for a vehicle's movement [19].…”
Section: Overall On-board Data Flow Diagram For CCCmentioning
confidence: 99%