2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11571-017-9437-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative effect of random and time-periodic coupling strength on synchronization transitions in one-way coupled neural system: mean field approach

Abstract: The cooperative effect of random coupling strength and time-periodic coupling strengh on synchronization transitions in one-way coupled neural system has been investigated by mean field approach. Results show that cooperative coupling strength (CCS) plays an active role for the enhancement of synchronization transitions. There exist an optimal frequency of CCS which makes the system display the best CCS-induced synchronization transitions, a critical frequency of CCS which can not further affect the CCS-induce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neuronal bursting, a common firing pattern of these electrical activities observed in many electrophysiological experiments, has been studied extensively (Ji et al 2015 ; Izhikevich 2000 ; Kepecs and Wang 2000 ; Wang et al 2011 ; Shi et al 2017 ; Zhang et al 2016 ; Perc and Marhl 2005 ; Gu et al 2015 ; Jia et al 2017 ; Duan et al 2017 ). These studies mainly focus either on mathematical models for numerical analysis or on elucidating the time coding characteristics of bursting activities (Ji et al 2015 ; Izhikevich 2000 ; Kepecs and Wang 2000 ; Wang et al 2011 ; Shi et al 2017 ). The latter approach is more common because it is assumed that the coding information is contained in the precise time structure between spikes or between bursts (Zhang et al 2016 ; Perc and Marhl 2005 ; Gu et al 2015 ; Jia et al 2017 ; Duan et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuronal bursting, a common firing pattern of these electrical activities observed in many electrophysiological experiments, has been studied extensively (Ji et al 2015 ; Izhikevich 2000 ; Kepecs and Wang 2000 ; Wang et al 2011 ; Shi et al 2017 ; Zhang et al 2016 ; Perc and Marhl 2005 ; Gu et al 2015 ; Jia et al 2017 ; Duan et al 2017 ). These studies mainly focus either on mathematical models for numerical analysis or on elucidating the time coding characteristics of bursting activities (Ji et al 2015 ; Izhikevich 2000 ; Kepecs and Wang 2000 ; Wang et al 2011 ; Shi et al 2017 ). The latter approach is more common because it is assumed that the coding information is contained in the precise time structure between spikes or between bursts (Zhang et al 2016 ; Perc and Marhl 2005 ; Gu et al 2015 ; Jia et al 2017 ; Duan et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Since the energy is a scalar, whether it is a single or neuron population, or whether it is a network or a behavioral, as well as a linear or a nonlinear neural model, their dynamic responses can be used to describe patterns of energy coding by superposition of neural energy [4,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Thus, global information about the inherent, intrinsic, and functional neural activities can be obtained, while it cannot be achieved by other traditional coding theories [15,[17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Voltage Synchrony Index. The degree of synchrony in the network is calculated according to the method developed by [42][43][44][45]. The population averaged voltage VðtÞ is defined as VðtÞ = ðV 1 ðtÞ+⋯+V N ðtÞÞ/N, where N is the number of cells, and then the voltage synchrony index SV is computed as follows:…”
Section: Description Of the Input From Differentmentioning
confidence: 99%