2022
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.2c04694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative Effects of Active Sites in the MTO Process: A Computational Study of the Aromatic Cycle in H-SSZ-13

Abstract: Brønsted acid sites in zeolites are typically described as single sites. Theoretical investigations of proximate acid sites have so far only found or considered indirect effects, where the additional acid sites influence the reactivity but do not directly participate in the reaction. Here, we investigate a case where a second acid site directly takes part in the reaction mechanism, and this leads to a significant lowering of the reaction barrier. This is shown for the side-chain mechanism of the aromatic cycle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, ZFO + SSZ-13 demonstrates a notable preference for C 3 hydrocarbons, achieving a selectivity of 25.7%, while ZFO + SAPO-34 exhibits a balanced selectivity across the C 2 –C 4 range. The dominance of C 3 products suggests that ethylene-to-propane (propylene) conversion reaction occurs within the framework of SSZ-13. Thus, as shown in Figure b, ZFO + SAPO-34 shows a C 2 selectivity of 16.5%, contrasting with ZFO + SSZ-13, which shows a 4.1% reduction in C 2 selectivity and a 4.6% increase in propane production, with propylene selectivity maintaining at 19.5% for both. This result strongly suggests that ethylene-to-propane conversion is dominant over ethylene-to-propylene conversion on SSZ-13.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Interestingly, ZFO + SSZ-13 demonstrates a notable preference for C 3 hydrocarbons, achieving a selectivity of 25.7%, while ZFO + SAPO-34 exhibits a balanced selectivity across the C 2 –C 4 range. The dominance of C 3 products suggests that ethylene-to-propane (propylene) conversion reaction occurs within the framework of SSZ-13. Thus, as shown in Figure b, ZFO + SAPO-34 shows a C 2 selectivity of 16.5%, contrasting with ZFO + SSZ-13, which shows a 4.1% reduction in C 2 selectivity and a 4.6% increase in propane production, with propylene selectivity maintaining at 19.5% for both. This result strongly suggests that ethylene-to-propane conversion is dominant over ethylene-to-propylene conversion on SSZ-13.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Larger changes in barriers of around ΔΔ G ‡ = 50 kJ mol −1 were observed in a recent investigation of the aromatic cycle, where the second acid site actively participated in the reaction mechanism. 144 We considered the involvement of a second acid site also for the reactions studied in this work, but did not find a mechanism where that seemed beneficial and we consequently performed no computational investigation of zeolite model with more than one acid site. In an earlier study, selected barriers for the MTO initiation mechanism were compared for H-SSZ-13, H-SZM-5, H-BEA and H-SAPO-34.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%