2014
DOI: 10.1109/taslp.2014.2375558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative Learning and its Application to Emotion Recognition from Speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the PU-based DDAT system is slightly more important for valence prediction than it is for arousal prediction. This might be due to the fact that prediction of emotional valence is much more difficult than arousal for audio modality [2], [67], [68].…”
Section: Dynamic Tuning and Late Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the PU-based DDAT system is slightly more important for valence prediction than it is for arousal prediction. This might be due to the fact that prediction of emotional valence is much more difficult than arousal for audio modality [2], [67], [68].…”
Section: Dynamic Tuning and Late Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common approach in the literature is to use all the emotion variability found in the data as training material and tune the machine learning system in order to disregard the less relevant instances (e. g., by optimising the number of support vectors and the soft margin in Support Vector Regression (SVR)) for emotion prediction [19], [30], [31], [32]. Some recent work have proposed to use cooperative learning as a means to select the most informative instances from a set of unlabelled acoustic utterances [33]. But the core underlying idea of this approach is to reduce the cost of the human annotation task, e. g., by selecting instances which are predicted with a low confidence level, not to consider consensus as a way to optimise the predictability of a given SER system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major attention is thus given to efficient procedures of data acquisition and annotation, such as by weakly supervised [28] or even unsupervised [34] learning approaches. As it is mostly the labels that are sparse rather than the data, crowd-sourcing and cooperative learning [35] are further popular recent assets to lead quickly to rich resources of annotated affective usage data. Similarly, transfer learning [7] can be used to adapt 'similar' data to the current IUI case.…”
Section: User Datamentioning
confidence: 99%