2009
DOI: 10.1080/09500690902721673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative Learning in Science: Follow‐up from primary to high school

Abstract: Nutzungsbedingungen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0
12

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
19
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Elementary science teachers need to develop pedagogical content knowledge, which means knowing how to make science content meaningful, useful, and engaging (Duschl et al, ; Cobern & Loving, ; Zembal‐Saul, Starr, & Krajcik, ). Previous work on cooperative learning in science has demonstrated that it is the interactions established through cooperative learning that best predict positive outcomes (Howe et al, ; Thurston et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elementary science teachers need to develop pedagogical content knowledge, which means knowing how to make science content meaningful, useful, and engaging (Duschl et al, ; Cobern & Loving, ; Zembal‐Saul, Starr, & Krajcik, ). Previous work on cooperative learning in science has demonstrated that it is the interactions established through cooperative learning that best predict positive outcomes (Howe et al, ; Thurston et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, individuals' competitive behaviour is discouraged in favour of cooperative group-centred learning. Many researchers stress that CL helps to attain both academic and social goals (Gillies & Boyle, 2010;Gillies & Boyle, 2011;Shih, 2011;Thurston, et al, 2010). Meanwhile, Gillies and Boyle (2010) identify three issues to be carefully considered when implementing CL, namely, students' socialisation during group activities, time management, and the preparation required by teachers.…”
Section: Using Cooperative Learning In Statistics Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross‐age peer mentoring has had a positive effect in reading and mathematics on the learning of both the mentee and the mentor, provided the age gap between the two is at least 2 years (Topping et al ., ; Tymms et al ., ). Subject‐specific mentoring has been shown to function as a useful buffer to the more general challenges faced by those in transition to secondary school (Thurston et al ., ). The positive impact of cross‐age peer mentoring has been reported to be more pronounced among students from lower socio‐economic backgrounds and among girls (Rohrbeck, Ginsburg‐Block, Fantuzzo, & Miller, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%