2001
DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00621.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative Learning Instructional Activities in a Capstone Design Course

Abstract: In developing our capstone design course, we decided to include instruction in design methodology, project management, engineering communications, and professional ethics, along with a comprehensive design project. As this course evolved over a number of years, we found that active and cooperative learning was critical for effective instruction in these topics and we developed a series of instructional activities using this methodology. These activities consisted of short presentations (mini‐lectures) with int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the high level of academic achievement typically associated with cooperative situations does not necessarily guarantee that students working within a group will outperform those who work alone. Most social scientists agree that only relatively mature and well-developed groups outperform individuals (Johnson & Johnson, 2002 (Felder & Brent, 1994, 2001Johnson & Johnson, 1978, 1989Oakley, Felder, Brent, & Elhajj, 2004;Smith, Sheppard, Johnson, & Johnson, 2005). This study confirms that the performance of individuals working within a team improves as the team matures.…”
Section: Unit Testssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the high level of academic achievement typically associated with cooperative situations does not necessarily guarantee that students working within a group will outperform those who work alone. Most social scientists agree that only relatively mature and well-developed groups outperform individuals (Johnson & Johnson, 2002 (Felder & Brent, 1994, 2001Johnson & Johnson, 1978, 1989Oakley, Felder, Brent, & Elhajj, 2004;Smith, Sheppard, Johnson, & Johnson, 2005). This study confirms that the performance of individuals working within a team improves as the team matures.…”
Section: Unit Testssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Students in the cooperative learning condition were instructed to work together as a team to maximize the academic success of all the team members (Johnson, Johnson, & Smith, 1991). While cooperative learning has many different implementation models in the engineering education context (Felder & Brent, 2003;Mourtos, 1997;Pimmel, 2001;Terenzini, 2001), this study closely follows the well-structured model proposed by Johnson (Felder &Brent, 1994, 2001;Johnson & Johnson, 1978, 1989Oakley, Felder, Brent, & Elhajj, 2004;Smith, Sheppard, Johnson, & Johnson, 2005). This model states that five criteria must be satisfied for instruction to qualify as cooperative learning: positive interdependence, individual accountability, face-to-face promotive interaction, teamwork skills, and group processing.…”
Section: Independent Variablementioning
confidence: 92%
“…An example of this approach is the use of project-based collaborative learning methodologies (Felder 2005, Pimmel 2001 Felder (1988) makes a distinction between student learning approaches, namely, surface, strategic, and deep approaches. In the surface approach students memorize facts but do not try to fit them into the larger context and follow routine solution procedures without trying to understand their origins and limitations.…”
Section: Systems Engineering Education: Teaching Methods and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved through cooperative educational activities, wherein students are divided into small electronic discussion groups to achieve common educational goals . [5] As the digital tools and multimedia promote individualized instruction, these can be employed to give students experience in a subjective manner on their own, with the teacher designing lessons centered on the student's individual characteristics using programmed learning such as modeling, simulation and role-playing games in extra-curricular educational activities [6]. The lessons are delivered by a qualified teacher using modern technological applications (a PowerPoint presentation, for example).…”
Section: A Assure Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%