2019
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2018.2883485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative Shock Waves Mitigation in Mixed Traffic Flow Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 -System Objectives: among the compared systems, three main purposes stand out: minimising travel time (Agarwal and Paruchuri, 2016), reducing energy consumption and pollution (Pulter et al, 2011) and smooth driving (Di Vaio et al, 2019). It should be noted, that these issues are not independent.…”
Section: Criteria Of Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 -System Objectives: among the compared systems, three main purposes stand out: minimising travel time (Agarwal and Paruchuri, 2016), reducing energy consumption and pollution (Pulter et al, 2011) and smooth driving (Di Vaio et al, 2019). It should be noted, that these issues are not independent.…”
Section: Criteria Of Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A shock wave is often the result of intense actions such as emergency braking and it results in slowdowns and an increase of traffic density. (Di Vaio et al, 2019) propose a control strategy with MAS in which CAVs coexist with non autonomous vehicles, both being connected. CAV agents use the exchanged data to adapt their speed and to be informed as quickly as possible about the actions of others.…”
Section: Reduce Shock Waves Using Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some notable studies have focused on the stability analysis of AVs considering the vehicle system delays. Some studies analysed the effect of sensor delay [7, 8], actuator lag delay [6, 9], and both the two delays [4, 10] on the string stability for AVs. However, few studies have considered the impact of the model gain parameter on traffic stability [11] and the own string stability realised by the feasible control parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control strategies are easily applied in a pure CAVs environment. For mixed traffic, it is implemented by assuming non‐CAVs broadcast the state information [8, 12, 16, 17]. Moreover, these studies employed the stability criteria of head‐to‐tail string stability, due to the string stability has rigid criteria for the mixed traffic [18, 19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many real systems in nature and human society can be modeled as MAS and many researchers, inspired by natural occurrence of flocking and formation forming, have focused their work on synchronization, consensus and coordination of these latter [32], i.e., in controlling the whole network in order to produce a common behavior by applying distributed algorithms and to guarantee a smart group behavior. Examples in engineering deal with the coordinated motion of autonomous vehicles [33][34][35], the phase or frequency synchronization in large power grids [36], and the synchronization of wireless sensor networks [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%