2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2015.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordinate-free formation stabilization based on relative position measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Choosing a sufficiently large value for and taking into account the definition ofΓ 1 in (17), we have that (24) holds if diag Finally, note that (25) always holds for any positive K 1 and K 2 since > 0. Therefore, the fulfilment of (25) implies (16) when is small enough. Given a multiagent system, note that Theorem 1 requires a prior knowledge of to check its stability.…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Choosing a sufficiently large value for and taking into account the definition ofΓ 1 in (17), we have that (24) holds if diag Finally, note that (25) always holds for any positive K 1 and K 2 since > 0. Therefore, the fulfilment of (25) implies (16) when is small enough. Given a multiagent system, note that Theorem 1 requires a prior knowledge of to check its stability.…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Differently to other similar results in formation control with communication delays, 16 where the communication topology is complete, we assume a partial communication topology with the only requirement to be connected. Therefore, it is not necessary the availability of all the information concerning the relative interagent position measurements by each agent.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…() Alternative control laws were proposed, for examples, designing control weights for the stabilization of affine formations, simultaneously aligning the agents' local coordinate frames and controlling the relative positions. () These strategies provide global convergence of the formation to the desired shape; however, there are also trade‐offs on these solutions. In affine formations, all agents are required to have the same coordinate systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%