2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2004.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordinated design and performance evaluation of UPFC supplementary modulation controllers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute values of participation factors are computed using Equation (11) for different values of the SSSC gain and tabulated in Table II. The absolute values of participation factors are computed using Equation (11) for different values of the SSSC gain and tabulated in Table II.…”
Section: Three-machine Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absolute values of participation factors are computed using Equation (11) for different values of the SSSC gain and tabulated in Table II. The absolute values of participation factors are computed using Equation (11) for different values of the SSSC gain and tabulated in Table II.…”
Section: Three-machine Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system considered is that as in [15]. The EM is identified by computing the participation factors using Equation (11) for different values of the SSSC damping controller gain K q . The operating value of the output of the SSSC is zero.…”
Section: Four-machine Two-area Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some auxiliary robust stabilizing signals may be incorporated into the UPFC series controller to provide a feasible solution for stability enhancement [7][8]. An ∞ H mixed sensitivity approach can be applied to damping controller design for the UPFC [9] and a comparison has been made between the performance of ∞ H algorithm and μ-synthesis, developed for the SVC, in the presence of disturbances [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the fast progress in the field of power electronics has opened new opportunities for the power industry via utilization of the controllable FACTS devices such as UPFC, TCSC and SVC which offer an alternative means to mitigate power system oscillations [1] . Because of the extremely fast control action associated with FACTS-device operations, they have been very promising candidates for mitigation power system oscillation in addition to improve power system steady-state performance [2][3] . UPFC is regarded as one of the most versatile devices in the FACTS device family [4][5] , has the capabilities of control power flow in the transmission line, improving the transient stability, mitigation system oscillation and providing voltage support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An industrial process, such as a power system, contains different kinds of uncertainties due to changes in system parameters and characteristics, loads variation and errors in the modeling. As a result, a fixed parameter controller based on the classical control theory such as PI or lead-lag controller [3,[7][8][9] is not certainly suitable for a UPFC control method. Thus, some authors have suggested fuzzy logic controllers [10] and neural networks method [11] to deal with system parameters changes for enhance system damping performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%