2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10555-020-09922-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordinated dysregulation of cancer progression by the HER family and p21-activated kinases

Abstract: Most epithelial cancer types are polygenic in nature and are driven by coordinated dysregulation of multiple regulatory pathways, genes, and protein modifications. The process of coordinated regulation of cancer promoting pathways in response to extrinsic and intrinsic signals facilitates the dysregulation of several pathways with complementary functions, contributing to the hallmarks of cancer. Dysregulation and hyperactivation of cell surface human epidermal growth factor receptors (HERs) and cytoskeleton re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
(237 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using confocal immunofluorescence microscopy, we observed varying but distinctive nuclear PAK1 localization in parent myxofibrosarcoma cells ( Figure-S6A ), commensurate with significant nuclear PAK1 immunoexpression in a subset of aggressive myxofibrosarcomas detailed below. PAK1 signaling may modulate angiogenesis through multiple pathways, including generation of tumor-derived secreted factors in cancer cells or stimulation of the endothelium-specific PAK1 activation in endothelial cells 13 , 19 , 25 , 26 . Our in vitro evidence indicated that CSF2 is a potential PAK1-driven angiogenic factor self-produced by myxofibrosarcoma cells ( Figure- 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using confocal immunofluorescence microscopy, we observed varying but distinctive nuclear PAK1 localization in parent myxofibrosarcoma cells ( Figure-S6A ), commensurate with significant nuclear PAK1 immunoexpression in a subset of aggressive myxofibrosarcomas detailed below. PAK1 signaling may modulate angiogenesis through multiple pathways, including generation of tumor-derived secreted factors in cancer cells or stimulation of the endothelium-specific PAK1 activation in endothelial cells 13 , 19 , 25 , 26 . Our in vitro evidence indicated that CSF2 is a potential PAK1-driven angiogenic factor self-produced by myxofibrosarcoma cells ( Figure- 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the clinical and functional relevance of PAK1 and associated signaling remains undefined in myxofibrosarcoma. Compared with RSF1, PAK1, the prototypical member of p21-activating kinase family, is relatively feasible as a direct therapeutic target, since PAK1 functions as a cytosolic molecular hub converging upstream signals mediated by RhoGTPases to integrate various mitogenic and morphogenetic inputs and transcriptionally co-regulate expression of target genes upon nuclear relocation [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Ivyspringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since P21 is downstream to p53 which is frequently mutated in cancer, P21 activity can be dysregulated in cancer. Indeed, some studies have suggested that P21 can paradoxically promote proliferation in cancer cells under certain conditions [26,27,28,29,30]. We directly manipulated P21 in both P53-mutant (GBM6) and P53-WT cells with (GBM164) and without (GBM39) IDH-mutation and observed that P21-induced apoptosis and senescence in surviving cells in each cell line.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, the mechanism of action of the two therapies may have a certain overlap. Previous studies have revealed that neuregulin-dependent ErbB3 and ErbB4 signaling in cancer cells contributed to VEGF-mediated angiogenesis and anti-apoptosis [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Furthermore, non-cancerous stromal cell- or vascular endothelial cell-derived neuregulin also promoted angiogenesis and VEGF expression via ErbB3 and ErbB4 in an autocrine or paracrine manner [ 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%