2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.11.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordinated Regulation of Actin Filament Turnover by a High-Molecular-Weight Srv2/CAP Complex, Cofilin, Profilin, and Aip1

Abstract: We define two genetically and biochemically separable functions for cofilin in actin turnover. One is formation of an Aip1-cofilin cap at filament barbed ends. The other is cofilin-mediated severing/depolymerization of filaments, accelerated indirectly by Srv2 complex. We show that the Srv2 complex is a large multimeric structure and functions as an intermediate in actin monomer processing, converting cofilin bound ADP-actin monomers to profilin bound ATP-actin monomers and recycling cofilin for new rounds of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
226
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
15
226
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a whole, these findings show that both individual actin binding sites and the cofilin binding site are necessary for proper Aip1p activity in vivo. If Aip1p is truly a barbed-end capping protein as reported previously (Okada et al, 2002;Balcer et al, 2003), we would expect the aip1 mutants to have more serious synthetic defects with the cap⌬ alleles, because they would be expected to be redundant in function. Interestingly, the actin binding site-specific aip1 alleles are more defective with the rvs161/ 167 deletions than they are with the cap1/cap2 deletions, suggesting a greater functional involvement of Aip1p and possibly Aip1p-facilitated severing with the RVS proteins than with the Cap proteins.…”
Section: Genetic Interactions With Aip1 Mutants Confirm Active Sites mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As a whole, these findings show that both individual actin binding sites and the cofilin binding site are necessary for proper Aip1p activity in vivo. If Aip1p is truly a barbed-end capping protein as reported previously (Okada et al, 2002;Balcer et al, 2003), we would expect the aip1 mutants to have more serious synthetic defects with the cap⌬ alleles, because they would be expected to be redundant in function. Interestingly, the actin binding site-specific aip1 alleles are more defective with the rvs161/ 167 deletions than they are with the cap1/cap2 deletions, suggesting a greater functional involvement of Aip1p and possibly Aip1p-facilitated severing with the RVS proteins than with the Cap proteins.…”
Section: Genetic Interactions With Aip1 Mutants Confirm Active Sites mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The ability of Aip1p to enhance severing of cofilin-decorated actin filaments has been convincingly documented (Okada et al, 1999;Ono et al, 2004). In addition, some findings indicate that Aip1p is able to cap the barbed ends of actin filaments, preventing filament elongation and thus enhancing disassembly (Okada et al, 2002;Balcer et al, 2003). Previous actin filament elongation assays using a range of XAip1 concentrations combined with cofilin provided persuasive evidence that XAip1 may exert a barbedend capping activity (Okada et al, 2002).…”
Section: Is Aip1p a Capping Protein?mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations