1996
DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00880.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordinated regulation of gene expression by the cell cycle transcription factor Swi4 and the protein kinase C MAP kinase pathway for yeast cell integrity.

Abstract: Specific transcription in late G1, mediated by the transcription factors SBF (Swi4p-Swi6p) and MBF (Mbplp-Swi6p), is crucial for cell cycle progression in budding yeast. In order to better understand the G1/S transition, we initiated a search for conditional mutations synthetic lethal with swi4A. One of the isolated mutants, rsf8swi4A, showed a growth defect due to cell lysis. rsf8 is allelic to PKCJ, encoding a protein kinase C homologue which controls cell integrity. In the presence of the rsf8/(pkcl-8) muta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
258
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
17
258
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We can ask whether genes below the threshold might still be cell cycle regulated in a biologically significant way, and we can consider whether there are any circumstances in which our experiments might have failed to reveal the cell cycle pattern of regulation. In this context it is relevant that we do not identify 9 of the 104 genes (CDC8,DBF4,CHS3,PRI1,TIR1,CDC14,CLB3,DPB3,and RAD17) previously reported to be cell cycle regulated (White et al, 1987;Chapman and Johnston, 1989;Siede et al, 1989;Johnston et al, 1990b;Fitch et al, 1992;Wan et al, 1992;Igual et al, 1996;Caro et al, 1998). Of these, only RAD17 appears visually to vary with the cell cycle in our data and then only in the cdc15 experiment.…”
Section: Reliability Of the Methods For Assessing Cell Cycle Regulationmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…We can ask whether genes below the threshold might still be cell cycle regulated in a biologically significant way, and we can consider whether there are any circumstances in which our experiments might have failed to reveal the cell cycle pattern of regulation. In this context it is relevant that we do not identify 9 of the 104 genes (CDC8,DBF4,CHS3,PRI1,TIR1,CDC14,CLB3,DPB3,and RAD17) previously reported to be cell cycle regulated (White et al, 1987;Chapman and Johnston, 1989;Siede et al, 1989;Johnston et al, 1990b;Fitch et al, 1992;Wan et al, 1992;Igual et al, 1996;Caro et al, 1998). Of these, only RAD17 appears visually to vary with the cell cycle in our data and then only in the cdc15 experiment.…”
Section: Reliability Of the Methods For Assessing Cell Cycle Regulationmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The obvious answer would seem to be that, under normal circumstances, Chs3p is not saturated with Chs4p and that cellular levels of Chs4p represent one of the factors that regulate the availability of active enzyme. Other factors that may produce increased chitin synthesis include moderately increased transcription of CHS4 and CHS3 (6,18,20,40) and alterations in the localization of the enzyme (8,15,42). However, this attractive hypothesis needs to be proven.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that membrane-destabilizing drugs such as SDS and chlorpromazine affect yeast cell integrity (Igual et al, 1996;Kamada et al, 1995) suggested that TTO may also affect signalling. For this investigation, the effective TTO concentrations in the genetic background of S. cerevisiae strain HD56-5A needed to be determined.…”
Section: Effect Of Tea Tree Oil On Growth In Wild-type and Sensor Mutmentioning
confidence: 99%