2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.scico.2007.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordinating mobile agents in interaction spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous research, the closest relative to our approach is constituted by coordination languages for mobile agents (e.g. [22]). However, our work is different from these, since we are treating complete mobile devices as agents.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous research, the closest relative to our approach is constituted by coordination languages for mobile agents (e.g. [22]). However, our work is different from these, since we are treating complete mobile devices as agents.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, ActorSpace does not specify a failure model, whereas dataspaces signal failure with state-change notification events. Peschanski et al (2007) describe an actor-style system with multicast channels connecting actors, but do not consider layering of actor locations. They consider link failure, channel failure and location failure as distinct concepts, whereas the dataspace model unifies all of these in the state-change event mechanism.…”
Section: Formal Actor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%