Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community

Abstract

Many different private companies – shipping lines, terminal operating companies, forwarders, hinterland transport providers, and inland terminal operators – are involved in hinterland transport. In addition, different public actors such as the port authority, customs, and infrastructure managers are involved. Creating effective hinterland transport chains requires the coordination between all these actors; coordination does not come about spontaneously. Its development may be hindered by free-riding problems, a lack of contractual relationships, information asymmetry, and a lack of incentives for cooperation. This paper presents analyses of the coordination problems in hinterland chains of seaports and arrangements to resolve these problems. The most relevant coordination problems in hinterland chains are discussed. Based on insights from institutional economics, four main categories of arrangements to improve coordination are identified: the introduction of incentives, the creation of an interfirm alliance, changing the scope of the organisation, and collective action. An analysis is presented of a substantial number of coordination arrangements in hinterland transport to and from the port of Rotterdam, thereby indicating how coordination could be improved. Maritime Economics & Logistics (2008) 10, 108–129. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100194

The role of port authorities in the development of LNG bunkering facilities in North European ports

“…In respect of the emerging community manager function, the literature mainly emphasizes the role of port authorities as "systemic coordinator" in maintaining good relationships with port stakeholders (Chlomoudis et al 2003;De Langen and Chouly 2004;Van Der Horst and De Langen 2007). However, in this paper, we observe that community manager function can also play an important role in promoting innovation.…”

“…In this regard, some scholars propose a "renaissance" of the port authority (Notteboom and Winkelmans 2001b;Verhoeven 2010), i.e., the port authority should play a more proactive role beyond the traditional function in facilitating and coordinating stakeholders in logistics networks and creating core competencies in the highly competitive market by even adopting a more entrepreneurial role (Chlomoudis et al 2003;Comtois and Slack 2003;Notteboom and Winkelmans 2002;Van Der Lugt and De Langen 2007). De Langen (2004Langen ( , 2007 makes a plea for a new functional role of port authorities as "cluster managers" or "community managers" to solve collective action problems in and outside the port perimeters, such as hinterland bottlenecks, training and education, ICT, marketing and promotion, as well as innovation and internationalization (economic dimension) (De Langen and Chouly 2004;Van Der Horst and De Langen 2007). Chlomoudis et al (2003) refer to the community manager role of the port authority: "the systemic coordinator that advances and maintains good relationships with all port stakeholders, thus creating a port culture of trust.…”

Issues in Dry Port Location and Implementation in Metropolitan Areas: The Case of Sydney, Australia

“…However, the quality of inland access depends on the behavior of a large variety of actors such as government planning agencies, regulatory authorities, terminal operators, freight forwarders, transport operators, and port authorities and this requires coordination between all the actors involved (de Langen and Chouly, 2004;Van Der Horst and De Langen, 2008). A scheduled and reliable high-capacity transport by road and rail to and from the seaport is a prerequisite.…”

Intermodal terminal concessions: Lessons from the port sector

“…Arnold, Peeters, & Thomas, 2004;Ballis & Golias, 2002;Iannone, 2012;Janic, 2007;Kim & Wee, 2011;Kreutzberger, 2008), while qualitative approaches have sought to understand the importance of aligning cargo types with intermodal service characteristics (e.g. Eng-Larsson & Kohn, 2012;Monios, 2013;Slack & Vogt, 2007;Van der Horst & De Langen, 2008;Woodburn, 2003;Woodburn, 2011) as well as the role of transport industry actors in choosing intermodal transport rather than road haulage (e.g. Bärthel & Woxenius, 2004;Panayides, 2002;Runhaar & van der Heijden, 2005;Van Schijndel & Dinwoodie, 2000).…”