2016
DOI: 10.1210/en.2015-1962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordination of Actin- and Microtubule-Based Cytoskeletons Supports Transport of Spermatids and Residual Bodies/Phagosomes During Spermatogenesis in the Rat Testis

Abstract: Germ cell transport across the seminiferous epithelium during spermatogenesis requires the intricate coordination of cell junctions, signaling proteins, and both actin- and microtubule (MT)-based cytoskeletons. Although the involvement of cytoskeletons in germ cell transport has been suggested, the precise mechanism(s) remains elusive. Based on growing evidence that actin and MT interactions underlie fundamental cellular processes, such as cell motility, it is unlikely that actin- and MT-based cytoskeletons wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[55][56][57] It was noted that while spermatids near the tubule lumen at stage VI to early VIII were depleting from the epithelium, analogous to the release of sperm at spermiation, many step 19 spermatids remained entrapped deep inside the epithelium. 8 These step 19 spermatids were consistently found in the epithelium of stages IX, X, XI and XII tubules, until they were eventually engulfed and degraded by Sertoli cells. 8 More striking is the observation that the actin-based apical ES that anchored these spermatids deep inside the epithelium was found to be degenerated wherein the apical ES adhesion proteins (e.g., ß1-integrin, nectin-3) and the underlying F-actin were either downregulated or grossly disorganized or mis-localized.…”
Section: The Adjudin Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[55][56][57] It was noted that while spermatids near the tubule lumen at stage VI to early VIII were depleting from the epithelium, analogous to the release of sperm at spermiation, many step 19 spermatids remained entrapped deep inside the epithelium. 8 These step 19 spermatids were consistently found in the epithelium of stages IX, X, XI and XII tubules, until they were eventually engulfed and degraded by Sertoli cells. 8 More striking is the observation that the actin-based apical ES that anchored these spermatids deep inside the epithelium was found to be degenerated wherein the apical ES adhesion proteins (e.g., ß1-integrin, nectin-3) and the underlying F-actin were either downregulated or grossly disorganized or mis-localized.…”
Section: The Adjudin Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…8 These step 19 spermatids were consistently found in the epithelium of stages IX, X, XI and XII tubules, until they were eventually engulfed and degraded by Sertoli cells. 8 More striking is the observation that the actin-based apical ES that anchored these spermatids deep inside the epithelium was found to be degenerated wherein the apical ES adhesion proteins (e.g., ß1-integrin, nectin-3) and the underlying F-actin were either downregulated or grossly disorganized or mis-localized. 8 These findings suggest that even though apical ES and the underlying F-actin cytoskeletal network that supported step 19 spermatid adhesion had been compromised by adjudin treatment, these spermatids located deep inside the epithelium failed to be transported to the tubule lumen for their release, unlike those spermatids that resided near the tubule lumen which were emptied into the tubule lumen earlier.…”
Section: The Adjudin Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations