2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordination of dual-function acquisition price and corporate social responsibility in a sustainable closed-loop supply chain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies assume that remanufactured products are identical to the new products. At present, studies gradually focus on the marketing issues of remanufactured products, such as risk-utility evaluation [11], green demand [12], social responsibility [13], purchase intention [14,15], and consumers' selling intention [16], etc. However, these studies assume that the remanufactured products and the new products are independent and completely different, and the similarity has not been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies assume that remanufactured products are identical to the new products. At present, studies gradually focus on the marketing issues of remanufactured products, such as risk-utility evaluation [11], green demand [12], social responsibility [13], purchase intention [14,15], and consumers' selling intention [16], etc. However, these studies assume that the remanufactured products and the new products are independent and completely different, and the similarity has not been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Taleizadeh et al (2019) used a discount offer on the returned products so as to entice customers to bring back their used products. Hosseini-Motlagh et al (2020c) introduced economic incentives, Sabbaghnia and Taleizadeh (2020) used collection investment, and Hosseini-Motlagh et al (2020a) employed acquisition price as incentives for customers to return more items. Besides, some papers suggest that the incentive policies could not only raise the return quantity of used products but also affect the market demand for new products.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in such a case, not only the retailers’ profit is affected, but also the manufacturer’s performance is exacerbated. In the literature, various promotional offers, such as purchase price ( Bulmuş et al, 2014 ), reward-penalty ( Wang et al, 2017 ), discount offer ( Taleizadeh et al, 2019 ), economic incentives ( Hosseini-Motlagh et al, 2020c ), collection investment ( Sabbaghnia and Taleizadeh, 2020 ), and acquisition price ( Hosseini-Motlagh et al, 2020a ), have been proposed to augment the collection amount of used products, while CSR participation has not been studied in this regard. We contribute to this literature and investigate the case where two competitive retailers exert CSR as an incentive policy to raise the consumers’ willingness to return their plastic containers, which also affects the demand for new products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above-mentioned factors, reuse is considered to be one with the lowest cost [55]. To provide insight into the social sustainability, CSR activities are analyzed and explained by CLSC members [56].…”
Section: Social Supply Chain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%