2010
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m109.095596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordination of Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4 and Seven-up Controls Insect Counter-defense Cathepsin B Expression

Abstract: CmCatB, a cathepsin B-type cysteine protease, is insensitive to inhibition by the soybean cysteine protease inhibitor (scN). Cowpea bruchids dramatically induce CmCatB expression when major digestive proteases are inactivated by dietary scN, which is presumably an adaptive strategy that insects use to minimize effects of nutrient deficiency. In this study, we cloned the cowpea bruchid hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 (CmHNF-4) and demonstrated its involvement in transcriptional activation of CmCatB in the digestive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conclusive cases of insect resistance have been reported for a number of plants expressing recombinant protease inhibitors, but the pesticidal effects of these proteins proved negligible in many other instances despite protease inhibitory effects observed in vivo . Insect herbivores have evolved a range of strategies to cope with dietary protease inhibitors, notably involving complex digestive systems with proteases from diverse functional classes and families, target protease overexpression to outnumber the inhibitory proteins, , and the production of protease isoforms weakly sensitive to the inhibitors ingested. , Other adaptations to protease inhibitors include their degradation by nontarget midgut proteases, , the up-regulation of proteases from alternative functional classes, , and a reallocation of metabolic resources toward inhibitor-induced compensatory responses. , It is now well established that protease–inhibitor interactions in plant–insect systems are the result of a long, coevolutive process triggering the continuous diversification of insect protease and plant protease inhibitor functions. In most, if not all, cases the ectopic expression of a protease inhibitor in planta not only alters the activity of constitutively expressed target proteases in the midgut of naive herbivores but also induces a significant remodelling of both the midgut transcriptome and digestive protease complement. ,,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conclusive cases of insect resistance have been reported for a number of plants expressing recombinant protease inhibitors, but the pesticidal effects of these proteins proved negligible in many other instances despite protease inhibitory effects observed in vivo . Insect herbivores have evolved a range of strategies to cope with dietary protease inhibitors, notably involving complex digestive systems with proteases from diverse functional classes and families, target protease overexpression to outnumber the inhibitory proteins, , and the production of protease isoforms weakly sensitive to the inhibitors ingested. , Other adaptations to protease inhibitors include their degradation by nontarget midgut proteases, , the up-regulation of proteases from alternative functional classes, , and a reallocation of metabolic resources toward inhibitor-induced compensatory responses. , It is now well established that protease–inhibitor interactions in plant–insect systems are the result of a long, coevolutive process triggering the continuous diversification of insect protease and plant protease inhibitor functions. In most, if not all, cases the ectopic expression of a protease inhibitor in planta not only alters the activity of constitutively expressed target proteases in the midgut of naive herbivores but also induces a significant remodelling of both the midgut transcriptome and digestive protease complement. ,,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%