2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordination of high grain yield and high nitrogen use efficiency through large sink size and high post-heading source capacity in rice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the results of simulation, the enhanced RI daily was mainly achieved by faster growth rate of green leaf area (e.g., smaller t m and larger C m ) given that no significant difference exists in the values of light extinction coefficient (k) between cultivars or N rates. Similar values of k demonstrate that the canopy structure of these two cultivars showed little difference, and previous studies also reported that prevailing rice cultivars are close to the optimum canopy structure due to the ideotype approach [6,19,34]. Furtrher, many studies have shown that k was not influenced by nutrition status, such as nitrogen and phosphorous deficiency [15,35].…”
Section: Ri Acc or Rue: What Contributed More To Greater Biomass Accusupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the results of simulation, the enhanced RI daily was mainly achieved by faster growth rate of green leaf area (e.g., smaller t m and larger C m ) given that no significant difference exists in the values of light extinction coefficient (k) between cultivars or N rates. Similar values of k demonstrate that the canopy structure of these two cultivars showed little difference, and previous studies also reported that prevailing rice cultivars are close to the optimum canopy structure due to the ideotype approach [6,19,34]. Furtrher, many studies have shown that k was not influenced by nutrition status, such as nitrogen and phosphorous deficiency [15,35].…”
Section: Ri Acc or Rue: What Contributed More To Greater Biomass Accusupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Katsura et al [18] reported that high rice yield potential was mainly achieved by intense RI acc . Huang et al [19] indicate that higher RUE rather than RI acc contributed more to yield improvement. This inconsistency may be explained by different cultivars used, various nutrition status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modification of leaf morphology optimizes canopy structure to allow a more uniform light distribution within the canopy (Long et al., 2015). This led to higher light penetration into the canopy (a lower K , light extinction coefficient) and more synergetic distribution of light and N within the canopy (Huang, Yang, Li, Peng, & Wang, 2019). A study on soybeans ( Glycine max ; Koester, Nohl, Diers, & Ainsworth, 2016) highlights that daily carbon gain was greater in more recently released varieties, despite observing little improvement in the maximum photosynthetic capacity of this crop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has revealed that high-yield populations of rice must be high-efficiency populations after flowering, and that the photosynthetic productivity of the rice was the primary factor affecting its yield [25][26][27]. The Sichuan Basin has low-sunlight levels and high humidity, and the post-anthesis populations are often shaded, poorly ventilated, and light-transmissive, which leads to reduced accumulations of photosynthetic products after anthesis and accumulations of post-anthesis photosynthetic products among the rice groups with different yield levels.…”
Section: Optimal N Management During the Rice Season And N Applicatiomentioning
confidence: 99%