Coordination of sustainable financing for evidence-based youth mental health treatments: protocol for development and evaluation of the fiscal mapping process

Abstract

Background Sustained delivery of evidence-based treatments (EBTs) is essential to addressing the public health and economic impacts of youth mental health problems, but is complicated by the limited and fragmented funding available to youth mental health service agencies (hereafter, “service agencies”). Strategic planning tools are needed that can guide these service agencies in their coordination of sustainable funding for EBTs. This protocol describes a mixed-methods research project designed to (1) develop and (2) evaluate our novel fiscal mapping process that guides strategic planning efforts to finance the sustainment of EBTs in youth mental health services. Method Participants will be 48 expert stakeholder participants, including representatives from ten service agencies and their partners from funding agencies (various public and private sources) and intermediary organizations (which provide guidance and support on the delivery of specific EBTs). Aim 1 is to develop the fiscal mapping process: a multi-step, structured tool that guides service agencies in selecting the optimal combination of strategies for financing their EBT sustainment efforts. We will adapt the fiscal mapping process from an established intervention mapping process and will incorporate an existing compilation of 23 financing strategies. We will then engage participants in a modified Delphi exercise to achieve consensus on the fiscal mapping process steps and gather information that can inform the selection of strategies. Aim 2 is to evaluate preliminary impacts of the fiscal mapping process on service agencies’ EBT sustainment capacities (i.e., structures and processes that support sustainment) and outcomes (e.g., intentions to sustain). The ten agencies will pilot test the fiscal mapping process. We will evaluate how the fiscal mapping process impacts EBT sustainment capacities and outcomes using a comparative case study approach, incorporating data from focus groups and document review. After pilot testing, the stakeholder participants will conceptualize the process and outcomes of fiscal mapping in a participatory modeling exercise to help inform future use and evaluation of the tool. Discussion This project will generate the fiscal mapping process, which will facilitate the coordination of an array of financing strategies to sustain EBTs in community youth mental health services. This tool will promote the sustainment of youth-focused EBTs.

Implementing trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy in Philadelphia: A 10-year evaluation

“…Researchers invested in partnering with public systems to implement evidence-based treatments can work to identify aspects of implementation that are not accounted for by current behavioral health financing models. Implementation researchers have proposed several ways to do this, including using a fiscal mapping process and evaluating the efficacy of disparate financing strategies ( Dopp, Gilbert, et al, 2022 ; Dopp, Hunter, et al, 2022 ). Policymakers can then leverage this research to design strategies to comprehensively provide financial support to service systems for implementation initiatives.…”

Revisiting the policy ecology framework for implementation of evidence-based practices in mental health settings

“…Originally focused on service delivery agencies (e.g., state departments of mental health) and financing agencies (e.g., state Medicaid departments), the PEF aligned with calls from implementation scientists to cultivate a “tailored selection” of strategies specific to the goals, barriers, and contextual demands of an implementation effort [ 12 , 38 – 40 ]. Now, owing to federal and state policy actions, regulatory agencies (child welfare or mental health departments) have greatly increased their implementation-focused activities.…”

“…Within county-based health systems, contracts tether county agencies and private, non-profit agencies to fill service gaps [ 18 , 53 ]. Contracts are key elements of a multi-level fiscal support mechanism increasingly seen across the USA that braid contracting, incentives, fees for service, and grants [ 38 , 50 ]. Contracts explicate the expectations of organizations to deliver EBPs and, in turn, communicate system-level support of agencies and their service environments.…”

Capacity Strategies a Comparative Perspective in Manufacturing vs Service Industries

“…Penelitian kualitatif berfokus padda pemeriksaan yang mendalam terhadap suatu hubungan, aktivitas, situasi, atau berbagai bahan lainnya. Penelitian ini menitikberatkan pada gambaran menyeluruh secara terperinci terhadap aktivitas atau situasi yang sementara terjadi, daripada membandingkan hasil dari perlakuan tertentu, atau menerangkan sikap atau perilaku seseorang [20]. Penelitian kualitatif digunakan karena memiiki tujuan untuk mendapatkan pemahaman yang mendalam tentang bagaimana sebuah organisasi di kedua sektor industri.…”