2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7ce01682d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordination polymer based perovskite device: matched energy levels and photocurrent enhancement in the absence or presence of methanol

Abstract: A coordination polymer based perovskite device yielded much larger photocurrent density with or without methanol under visible light illumination, which is ascribed to their matched VBM/CBM energy levels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure , 1 – 6 exhibit a stable and clear photocurrent response of 1.59 × 10 –5 , 1 ; 1.12 × 10 –5 , 2 ; 2.07 × 10 –5 , 3 ; 1.39 × 10 –5 , 4 ; 4.45 × 10 –5 , 5 ; and 6.62 × 10 –5 mA cm –2 , 6 , with irradiation of a 50 W LED lamp every 10 s switching cycle (λ = 420 nm). Based on these values, the photocurrent densities can be arranged as 6 > 5 > 3 > 1 > 4 > 2 , which follows the reverse order of their bandgap. , The high photocurrent density of 6 could be explained on the basis of the band gap (1.92 eV, 6 ), which is lower than other compounds (2.03, 1 ; 2.06, 2 ; 2.00, 3 ; 2.05, 4 ; 1.99 eV, 5 ), indicating that the electrons from the HOMO are more easily excited and injected into the LUMO of 6 in contrast to other compounds. Therefore, 6 produces larger current density than other compounds.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure , 1 – 6 exhibit a stable and clear photocurrent response of 1.59 × 10 –5 , 1 ; 1.12 × 10 –5 , 2 ; 2.07 × 10 –5 , 3 ; 1.39 × 10 –5 , 4 ; 4.45 × 10 –5 , 5 ; and 6.62 × 10 –5 mA cm –2 , 6 , with irradiation of a 50 W LED lamp every 10 s switching cycle (λ = 420 nm). Based on these values, the photocurrent densities can be arranged as 6 > 5 > 3 > 1 > 4 > 2 , which follows the reverse order of their bandgap. , The high photocurrent density of 6 could be explained on the basis of the band gap (1.92 eV, 6 ), which is lower than other compounds (2.03, 1 ; 2.06, 2 ; 2.00, 3 ; 2.05, 4 ; 1.99 eV, 5 ), indicating that the electrons from the HOMO are more easily excited and injected into the LUMO of 6 in contrast to other compounds. Therefore, 6 produces larger current density than other compounds.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on these values, the photocurrent densities can be arranged as 6 > 5 > 3 > 1 > 4 > 2, which follows the reverse order of their bandgap. 65,66 The high photocurrent density of 6 could be explained on the basis of the band gap (1.92 eV, 6), which is lower than other compounds (2.03, 1; 2.06, 2; 2.00, 3; 2.05, 4; 1.99 eV, 5), indicating that the electrons from the HOMO are more easily excited and injected into the LUMO of 6 in contrast to other compounds. Therefore, 6 produces larger current density than other compounds.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%