2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01126.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copeptin and Peroxiredoxin-4 Independently Predict Mortality in Patients With Nonspecific Complaints Presenting to the Emergency Department

Abstract: Objectives: Patients presenting to emergency departments (ED) with nonspecific complaints (NSCs) such as ''not feeling well,'' ''feeling weak,'' ''being tired,'' ''general deterioration,'' or other similar chief complaints that do not have a readily identifiable probable etiology are a common patient group at risk for adverse outcomes. Certain biomarkers, which have not yet been tested for prognostic value when applied to ED patients with NSCs, have emerged as useful tools for predicting prognosis in patients … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, genetic or tissue biomarkers might assist clinicians in distinguishing the frail elderly phenotype from the acutely ill but otherwise healthy geriatric adult with adequate physiologic reserve. [100][101][102][103] In addition, assessing disease-specific prognostic risk (the heart failure prognostic instruments, 22 for example) in conjunction with tools like the ISAR or TRST might yield more accurate estimates of risk for short-term adverse outcomes. Second, in many patients a return to the ED or subsequent hospitalization can be expected and appropriate, but most studies did not distinguish anticipated from unexpected readmissions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, genetic or tissue biomarkers might assist clinicians in distinguishing the frail elderly phenotype from the acutely ill but otherwise healthy geriatric adult with adequate physiologic reserve. [100][101][102][103] In addition, assessing disease-specific prognostic risk (the heart failure prognostic instruments, 22 for example) in conjunction with tools like the ISAR or TRST might yield more accurate estimates of risk for short-term adverse outcomes. Second, in many patients a return to the ED or subsequent hospitalization can be expected and appropriate, but most studies did not distinguish anticipated from unexpected readmissions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5 Regional levels of CPT, proADM and proANP in 54 patients with cirrhosis, stratified by disease modalities and pharmacologic treatment Table 5 Continued prolonged affection of the heart function without causing acute stress. Copeptin has previously been suggested as a prognostic marker for severity of various diseases [8,28] and survival in cardiac failure and patients presenting, for example, to the emergency department [7,37]. It has been emphasized that the nonspecific character of CPT improves its diagnostic value as a marker of disease processes in multiorgan diseases [38].…”
Section: Haemodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, copeptin levels are independent predictors of survival in critically ill patients suffering from hemorrhagic and septic shock [10]. Furthermore, copeptin levels have prognostic implications in patients with acute myocardial infarction [9], acute heart failure [18], acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [19], and in patients with nonspecific complaints [13]. Moreover, several studies suggest prognostic value of plasma copeptin in demonstrating acute neuronal injury in many conditions, such as ischemic stroke [7], intracerebral hemorrhage [23], aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage [24], traumatic brain injury [3], and transient ischemic attacks [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%