Women's ability to perceive risk of acquaintance sexual assault is key to decreasing its likelihood. This study examined the relationship between women's recognition of known situational risk factors and global perceived risk, prior victimization, and drinking habits. Women consistently distinguished between clear and ambiguous situational risk factors although these were not related to perceived global risk. They also manifested positivity bias, the tendency to underestimate their own risk of being assaulted relative to other women. Both prior victimization and drinking habits were related to risk judgments. This study raises important issues concerning developing effective defensive strategies for combating sexual assault.Early recognition that a social situation with a male acquaintance or intimate partner has become threatening can aid a woman in preventing a serious incident of sexual aggression. Despite substantial evidence that women are more likely to be assaulted by someone they know than by a stranger (Koss, Gidycz, & Wisniewski, 1987), women typically fear stranger sexual aggression more (Hickman & Muehlenhard, 1995) and prepare themselves better to fend off an aggressive incident by a stranger (Fischoff, Furby, & Morgan, 1987). This study was conducted to explore some of the cognitive processes that underlie women's perceptions of sexual aggression risk by a male acquaintance.The first goal of this study was to assess the extent to which women recognize known risk factors associated with acquaintance sexual aggression as presenting a potential threat for them personally. Judging that a social situation is dangerous is a more complex psychological task than making the same judgment about a stranger attack (Amick & Calhoun, 1987). Many risk factors for sexual assault such as alcohol consumption, a man paying for dating expenses, and being alone with a man (Harney & Muehlenhard, 1991;Mandoki & Burkhart, 1989;Muehlenhard & Linton, 1987) are also common elements of socializing. Thus, women may not view these risk factors as danger cues, but rather see them as positive or normal aspects of socializing with men.© 1999 Sage Publications, Inc.
HHS Public Access
Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript
Author ManuscriptThe second goal of this study was to examine the relationships between situationally specific and global risk perceptions. Are women's judgments of specific situational risk factors related to a global sense of being at risk? As noted by Nurius (in press), the two phenomena involve different types of cognitive assessments. Evaluating risk for a specific outcome requires focusing on the situation as well as on one's relationships, goals, and history. Within this framework, one considers what might pose a threat, how large the threat is, and how it might be countered (Smith, Haynes, Lazarus, & Pope, 1993;Weinstein, 1993). In contrast, global risk perception involves focusing on broad environmental conditions that pertain to whole groups rather than to an individual herself. On...