Coping Strategies for Landslide and Flood Disasters: A Qualitative Study of Mt. Elgon Region, Uganda

Abstract

Introduction: The occurrence of landslides and floods in East Africa has increased over the past decades with enormous Public Health implications and massive alterations in the lives of those affected. In Uganda, the Elgon region is reported to have the highest occurrence of landslides and floods making this area vulnerable. This study aimed at understanding both coping strategies and the underlying causes of vulnerability to landslides and floods in the Mt. Elgon region.Methods: We conducted a qualitative study in three districts of Bududa, Manafwa and Butalejja in the Mt. Elgon region in eastern Uganda. Six Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and eight Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) were conducted. We used trained research assistants (moderator and note taker) to collect data. All discussions were audio taped, and were transcribed verbatim before analysis. We explored both coping strategies and underlying causes of vulnerability. Data were analysed using latent content analysis; through identifying codes from which basis categories were generated and grouped into themes.Results: The positive coping strategies used to deal with landslides and floods included adoption of good farming methods, support from government and other partners, livelihood diversification and using indigenous knowledge in weather forecasting and preparedness. Relocation was identified as unsustainable because people often returned back to high risk areas. The key underlying causes of vulnerability were; poverty, population pressure making people move to high risk areas, unsatisfactory knowledge on disaster preparedness and, cultural beliefs affecting people’s ability to cope.Conclusion: This study revealed that deep rooted links to poverty, culture and unsatisfactory knowledge on disaster preparedness were responsible for failure to overcome the effects to landslides and floods in disaster prone communities of Uganda. However, good farming practices and support from the government and implementation partners were shown to be effective in enabling the community to lessen the negative effects disasters. This calls for high impact innovative interventions focused in addressing these underlying causes as well as involvement of all stakeholders in scaling the effective coping strategies in order to build resilience in this community and other similarly affected areas.Key words: Coping, Underlying causes, Floods, Landslides, Mt. Elgon, Uganda

Causes, impacts and coping strategies of floods in Ghana: a systematic review

“…For example, poor people tend to build houses and live in flood-prone areas as those areas are considered affordable. Moreover, the majority of them rely on government and other stakeholders for support when flood events strike [74]. In a similar study, 18.5% of inhabitants lived in flood-prone areas in the megacity of Dhaka [75].…”

Farmers’ landslide risk perceptions and willingness for restoration and conservation of world heritage site of Honghe Hani Rice Terraces, China

“…Many African farmers noticed that they could easily adapt to the effects of climate change if they had access to the markets, new technologies and credit facilities (Hassan and Nhemachena 2008). Likewise, in Uganda, positive coping strategies used to deal with landslides (and floods) included adoption of suitable farming methods, financial support from the government and other partners, livelihood diversification and using indigenous knowledge (Osuret et al 2016). In this sense, in the Indian mountain environments, the strategies used for soil loss mitigation not only concern environmental characteristics or market orientation but also have to take account of the community's own culture (Vedwan 2006).…”

Coping and adaptation strategies and institutional perceptions of hydrological risk in an urban Amazonian city

“…According to the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF, 2013), social rent is a form of governmental social assistance to help families in a disaster situation to recover. However, relocation often proves unsuccessful because people tend to return to the same risky areas (Osuret et al, 2016).…”