“…We and others have demonstrated the utility of the resident-intruder paradigm to study the differential consequences associated with the emergence of active and passive coping responses in the context of repeated social defeat exposure (Korte et al., 1992, Fokkema et al., 1995, Gomez-Lazaro et al., 2011, Wood et al., 2012, Chaijale et al., 2013, Perez-Tejada et al., 2013, Reyes et al., 2015, Wood et al., 2015). Analysis of behavior exhibited during defeat, such as immobility and exploration (De Miguel et al., 2011, Gomez-Lazaro et al., 2011, Perez-Tejada et al., 2013) or duration of upright posture and the latency to exhibit a supine posture signaling defeat (Wood et al., 2012, Wood et al., 2015, Reyes et al., 2015, Wood et al., 2015) can be used to statistically separate animals into passive or active subpopulations. Specifically, passive coping rodents are characterized by high levels of immobility, reduced exploratory behavior, little time spent in upright postures, and a short latency to display supine postures in response to an attack by the resident (De Miguel et al., 2011, Gomez-Lazaro et al., 2011, Wood et al., 2012, Perez-Tejada et al., 2013, Reyes et al., 2015, Wood et al., 2015), which is associated with the development of depressive-like behavioral endpoints as evidenced by increased immobility in the forced swim test (Wood et al., 2010, Gomez-Lazaro et al., 2011, Perez-Tejada et al., 2013) and reductions in sucrose preference (Wood et al., 2015).…”