2010
DOI: 10.5558/tfc86020-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coping with complexity: Designing low-impact forest bioenergy systems using an adaptive forest management framework and other sustainable forest management tools

Abstract: Forest fuel production is a growing industry in Canada and elsewhere, as governments strive to increase energy security and find alternatives to the use of fossil fuels. While forest bioenergy can provide environmental benefits such as renewability and carbon emissions reductions, the industry can also pose environmental risks through increasing pressure on forest resources. Because large-scale forest bioenergy production is relatively new to Canada, much is still unknown about how such an industry might evolv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Meaningful monitoring of the impacts of biomass harvesting on biodiversity may have to rely on the use of proxies, umbrella species, indicator species, and keystones that are relevant to the natural disturbance regime and are feasible to monitor reliably and at reasonable cost. Monitoring should include specific objectives and thresholds that trigger policy or operational change within an adaptive management framework (Bell et al 2008, Lattimore et al 2010.…”
Section: Meaningful Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meaningful monitoring of the impacts of biomass harvesting on biodiversity may have to rely on the use of proxies, umbrella species, indicator species, and keystones that are relevant to the natural disturbance regime and are feasible to monitor reliably and at reasonable cost. Monitoring should include specific objectives and thresholds that trigger policy or operational change within an adaptive management framework (Bell et al 2008, Lattimore et al 2010.…”
Section: Meaningful Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers from this workshop have already been published in The Forestry Chronicle, including an introduction to the workshop , information on low-impact forest bioenergy systems (Lattimore et al 2010), a conservation perspective (Hesselink 2010), issues related to site productivity (Thiffault et al 2010), operational and cost considerations (Ralevic et al 2010), and guidelines for whole-tree harvesting in Sweden (Levin and Eriksson 2010). This paper addresses the biodiversityfocused content of the workshop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptive forest management is a continuous, reiterative, evolving process seeking continual improvement. Sustainable forest management is a journey rather than a destination as ecosystems, society values, and knowledge change overtime ,. It is important that adaptive management be independently audited and reported to stakeholders .…”
Section: Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final principle requires a commitment to adaptive forest management. 2,75 The objective is to use continuing monitoring programs to evaluate the effectiveness of nutrient management plans and evaluate progress with the goals of sustainable management. If necessary, management would be altered either by reducing the impact of biomass removal or by other ameliorative techniques.…”
Section: Apply Adaptive Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptive management (AM) is a commonly advocated approach for both engaging stakeholders and dealing with uncertainties related to forest management (Baker 2000, Duinker andTrevisan 2003) and has now been adopted by MNR as a method to address uncertainties related to biomass harvesting (Hesselink 2010, Lattimore et al 2010, Thiffault et al 2010. A cyclical approach to learning is the core of AM whereby uncertainties in institutional policies and management direction are recognized and changed in light of new knowledge gained from assessment of the effectiveness of current policy and management directions in a continuous process of learning and adapting (Lee 1993, Fig.…”
Section: Accounting For Uncertainty Using An Adaptive Management Apprmentioning
confidence: 99%