2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coping with congestion: Understanding the role of simultaneous transportation demand management policies on commuters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to limit the present review to a manageable scope, we present only two examples per kind of benefit. Many other examples aimed at understanding the role of transportation demand management policies on commuters are found in the literature (see for instance Cass and Faulconbridge, 2016;Habibian and Kermanshah, 2013;Rotaris and Danielis, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to limit the present review to a manageable scope, we present only two examples per kind of benefit. Many other examples aimed at understanding the role of transportation demand management policies on commuters are found in the literature (see for instance Cass and Faulconbridge, 2016;Habibian and Kermanshah, 2013;Rotaris and Danielis, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing research on motivation in travel choice primarily focuses on three ideas. First, the traffic demand management policies, such as increasing parking fees, increasing fuel use costs and charging congestion charges are adopted to encourage residents to change their travel choice [14][15][16][17]. The second idea is derived from the external and objective factors that affect travel choice, such as urban planning, environmental characteristics, land use, etc.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on analyzing the influencing factors of rail transit and bus traffic attraction, Mark and Vladimir [24] built a competition model between rail transit and regular bus. Eriksson and Nordlund [25][26][27] studied two traffic policies that increased fuel taxes and increased public transport services. e effect of two policies on reducing the use of cars was not significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%