2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coping with Stress in Neoplastic Diseases

Abstract: Introduction: Disease-related stress is a common phenomenon. It also occurs in neoplastic diseases. Since physical and mental health are interrelated, it is important to make sure that treatment covers these two areas. Therefore, it is essential to learn how patients with neoplastic diseases can cope with stress. Materials and Methods: The respondents are 306 patients suffering from neoplastic diseases, associated in patient advocacy groups. The method is the Brief-COPE (Coping Orientation to Problems Experien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the researchers aimed to elucidate the relationships among QoL, FoP, and coping styles in individuals with PH using network analysis. Furthermore, given the differences in QoL, FoP, and coping styles by sex (Hasan et al, 2022;Pang & Humphris, 2021;Rodriguez-Arias & García-Álvarez, 2021) and age (Borgese et al, 2021;Olejniczak et al, 2022;Riggauer et al, 2022), the researchers also conducted a network comparison based on sex and age to ensure reliability of the results. S1 (Du & Fang, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the researchers aimed to elucidate the relationships among QoL, FoP, and coping styles in individuals with PH using network analysis. Furthermore, given the differences in QoL, FoP, and coping styles by sex (Hasan et al, 2022;Pang & Humphris, 2021;Rodriguez-Arias & García-Álvarez, 2021) and age (Borgese et al, 2021;Olejniczak et al, 2022;Riggauer et al, 2022), the researchers also conducted a network comparison based on sex and age to ensure reliability of the results. S1 (Du & Fang, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%