2014
DOI: 10.1126/science.1257890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coping with the curse of freshwater variability

Abstract: Institutions, infrastructure, and information for adaptation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
108
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These human activities have great and direct impacts on runoff [34]. Reservoir impoundment is used as an example.…”
Section: Comparison Between Two-and Multi-stage Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These human activities have great and direct impacts on runoff [34]. Reservoir impoundment is used as an example.…”
Section: Comparison Between Two-and Multi-stage Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing awareness of the capacity for adverse shocks to proliferate through linked systems, or 'systemic risks' (De Bandt & Hartmann 2000), has coincided with a focus on resource security and risk-based principles for decision-making under uncertainty (Hall et al 2014;Paté-Cornell 2012). The global challenge is to confront these systemic threats through resilient, sustainable, risk-based decision-making that responds to uncertainties and creates options to sustainably feed the world (WEF 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For climate exposure indicators we relied heavily on FEWSNET historical climate data [19] (4 of 6 indictors), and for sensitivity and adaptive capacity indicators we relied extensively on spatially interpolated Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data (3 of 12 indicators). Each data layer was justified based on its conceptual proximity to the three vulnerability components [15], and choices were consistent with the variables that have been found to be associated with harm from climate variability and change, including education levels [20], climate variability [21], and marginal (semi-arid and arid) environments and geographically remote areas in poor developing regions [12,22]. The guiding approach was to identify a limited number of high-quality spatial data sets that best represent the component of interest while avoiding the temptation to add low-quality data (data of high uncertainty or coarse spatial resolution), thereby "contaminating" the results.…”
Section: Mali Vulnerability Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%