2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2012.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coping with uncertainty, abundance and strife: Decision-making processes of Dutch acquisition editors in the global market for translations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
90
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…White and White, 1965;Bystryn, 1978;Greenfeld, 1988;Zolberg, 1995), in the social fabrication of news and news-worthiness (cf. Manning White, 1950;Franssen and Kuipers, 2013;Whitney and Becker, 1982), as well as within peer-review and scientific evaluation itself (cf. Janssen, 1997;Lamont and Huutoniemi, 2011).…”
Section: Earlier Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…White and White, 1965;Bystryn, 1978;Greenfeld, 1988;Zolberg, 1995), in the social fabrication of news and news-worthiness (cf. Manning White, 1950;Franssen and Kuipers, 2013;Whitney and Becker, 1982), as well as within peer-review and scientific evaluation itself (cf. Janssen, 1997;Lamont and Huutoniemi, 2011).…”
Section: Earlier Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…otherness of literature from different cultures. We wonder if in the future of publishing, besides using the two favourite tools of the trade (gut feeling and sales figures [15]) there will also grow a kind of data-driven market research using tools such as the one we are developing. Publishers could also start using these types of cultural interest measures to enrich their e-books with helpful annotations of difficult/unfamiliar concepts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, notwithstanding the fact that literary practices evolved over time and that national and transnational literacy fields have become much more commercialised as a result of global competition (Franssen and Kuipers 2013;Tomek 2015), Dutch editors, publishers and other gatekeepers still frequently mobilise an old-school modernist discourse that grounds literary quality in (overlapping) values such as individuality, originality, style, autonomy, neutrality and universality. Their assessment of literature is, however, by no means limited to solely modernist criteria.…”
Section: On Aesthetics Politics and Ethno-racial Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their assessment of literature is, however, by no means limited to solely modernist criteria. These cultural professionals use a wide array of repertoires to value genres such as romance or crime fiction (Franssen and Kuipers 2013), yet when it comes to judging novels they seem to resort to a reductive modernist discourse. Interestingly, in the interviews, early-twentieth-century modernist values are particularly used to demarcate between 'pure literature' and 'migrant literature'; it is often posited that the last named focuses too much on (politically loaded) content.…”
Section: On Aesthetics Politics and Ethno-racial Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%