2008 8th International Symposium on Antennas, Propagation and EM Theory 2008
DOI: 10.1109/isape.2008.4735404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coplanar waveguide structure of the differential connector impedance control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, up to now, most of the research considered tunability methods such as the use of microelectrical mechanical system (MEMS) [3], varactors [4], or other types of circuitry requiring external electrical biasing [5]. In this article, we present a novel tunable microwave filter based on an alternate method: direct optical control of a hybrid polymer material's permittivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, up to now, most of the research considered tunability methods such as the use of microelectrical mechanical system (MEMS) [3], varactors [4], or other types of circuitry requiring external electrical biasing [5]. In this article, we present a novel tunable microwave filter based on an alternate method: direct optical control of a hybrid polymer material's permittivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of BB‐ESPAR is designed to support any sub‐band. Coplanar waveguide CPW structure as a feeding element satisfies not only good characteristics impedance but also enhances frequency wideband by curving of the edge . Therefore, we designed cross CPW Dipole ESPAR antenna.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each model, a differential signaling structure renowned for its robust resistance to noise, commonly employed in high-speed lines, was applied. About this, the most suitable termination method chosen was to set the termination resistance of the differential lines to 100Ω [19]. This decision was made considering increased compatibility and standardization within the industry, aiming to mitigate signal reflections, waveform distortion, and noise through impedance matching efforts.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%