2008
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.200800025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper‐Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation

Abstract: Over the past decade, much effort has been put on designing efficient chiral ligands and screening of the different parameters that govern the main challenges of asymmetric S N 2Ј reactions, namely chemo-, regio-and enantioselectivity. This review traces the evolution of the methodologies for creating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of lithium halides as additives in the reaction (Table 1, entries [3][4][5] led to the complete conversion of compound 1 a into mixtures of 2 a and 3 a. Lithium bromide (Table 1, entry 4) was seen to give the best results (a point previously observed by the Evans group [15] ); the reaction being both regio-(2 a/3 a > 2:1) and enantioselective (74 %). The substitution reaction was also found to proceed under the more economical conditions in which 1.5 equivalents of the Grignard reagent, 0.75 equivalents of ZnBr 2 , and 1.5 equivalents of LiBr, compared to that of the substrate 1 a, were used (Table 1, entry 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The use of lithium halides as additives in the reaction (Table 1, entries [3][4][5] led to the complete conversion of compound 1 a into mixtures of 2 a and 3 a. Lithium bromide (Table 1, entry 4) was seen to give the best results (a point previously observed by the Evans group [15] ); the reaction being both regio-(2 a/3 a > 2:1) and enantioselective (74 %). The substitution reaction was also found to proceed under the more economical conditions in which 1.5 equivalents of the Grignard reagent, 0.75 equivalents of ZnBr 2 , and 1.5 equivalents of LiBr, compared to that of the substrate 1 a, were used (Table 1, entry 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The combined reaction mixture was stirred at RT for 2 min before Et 2 O (10 mL) and a saturated aqueous solution of NH 4 Cl (10 mL) were added to the reaction mixture. The organic layer was washed with brine (10 mL) and water (10 mL), then dried over Na 2 SO 4 and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified on silica gel chromatography column (SiO 2 , pentane, R f = 0.79) to recover products 17 (89 mg).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14,37, 47 The asymmetric induction in the presence of ligand 2 is low (7-11% ee; see Table 4, entries [5][6][7][8]. Interestingly, in this reaction, as in the above allylic substitution of (E) 1,3 diphenylallyl acetate, diamidophosphites 1 and 2 favor the formation of the opposite enantiomers of product 11.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Activity and enantioselectivity of the metal complex catalysts are determined to a great extent by a proper design and synthesis strategy of the corresponding chiral ligands, first of all, phosphorus containing ligands, thousands representatives of which were used in various asymmetric transformations. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] However, elaboration of an efficient asymmetric inductor for a given catalytic process often represents a challenge. The vast majority of known phosphorus-based chiral ligands in the corresponding metal complexes are able to catalyze (with different enantioselectivities) either a certain type of chemical transformation, or one certain reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%