Nickel was identified as ac atalyst for the cyclopropanation of unactivated olefins by using in situ generated lithiomethyl trimethylammonium triflate as amethylene donor. Am echanistic hypothesis is proposed in which the generation of ar eactive nickel carbene explains several interesting observations.A dditionally,o ur findings shed light on ar eport by Franzen and Wittigp ublished in 1960 that had been retracted later owingt oi rreproducibility,a nd provide arational basis for the systematic development of the reaction for preparative purposes as an alternative to diazomethane or Simmons-Smith conditions. In1960, in as hort Communication in Angewandte Chemie, Franzen and Wittig reported the cyclopropanation of cyclohexene with tetramethylammonium bromide (1)t og ive norcarane (2).[1] Dropwise addition of an ethereal solution of phenyllithium/phenylsodium (1:10) to asuspension of 1 in neat cyclohexene resulted in the formation of 2 in 5-18 % yield. Franzen and Wittig proposed the decomposition of trimethylammonium methylide into af ree carbene that is trapped by cyclohexene to give 2.In1964, in Liebigs Annalen, Wittig and Krauss reported that the 1960 cyclopropanation could not be reproduced under any conditions,and explicitly retracted the earlier claim.[2] Since then, this verdict has seemingly remained unchallenged;t here have been no published reports of any attempts to use tetramethylammonium salts as methylene donors and no citations of the work.[3]Herein, we report the nickel-catalyzed cyclopropanation of unactivated olefins with tetramethylammonium triflate and nBuLi, which suggests that Franzens work on cyclopropanation might have worked after all, albeit with the unsuspected influence of am etal catalyst. Moreover,w er eport unusual features of the reaction that would have hindered reproduction of the original work.There are only afew methods for the cyclopropanation of electron-rich olefins known, especially for simple methylenation. TheSimmons-Smith reaction is the method of choice in industry but has the drawback of generating alarge amount of waste.[4] Thed ecomposition of diazomethane with transition metals,a lthough very versatile,i sl imited to small-scale reactions owing to the inherent hazards of the reagent itself.[5, 6] As afe,s calable,a nd cost-effective method for these substrates would therefore be highly desirable.Our group recently reported the addition of lithiomethyl trimethylammonium triflate to unsaturated bonds to give aziridines,e poxides,a nd cyclopropanes. [7,8] Even though styrenes and stilbenes could be cyclopropanated in good to excellent yields,t he substrate scope was limited to these activated alkenes;attempts to cyclopropanate an unactivated olefin, cyclohexene,r esulted only in recovery of the starting material.We report now that avariety of nickel complexes catalyze the cyclopropanation of unactivated olefins.Inthe absence of catalyst, no reaction takes place (Table 1, entry 1). Different nickel sources,w ith and without added phosphine ligands, proved to be...