2018
DOI: 10.1149/2.0081802jes
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper Electroplating with Polyethylene Glycol: Part II. Experimental Analysis and Determination of Model Parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 – 8 Halide adsorption by itself leads to acceleration of the copper deposition rate while polyether co-adsorption on the halide adlayer gives rise to significant inhibition of copper deposition by limiting access of Cu 2+ aq to the metal surface. 1 – 26 Electroanalytical, 1 – 26 gravimetric microbalance, 14 , 15 ellipsometry 18 and vibrational spectroscopy 27 , 28 studies unambiguously demonstrate that halide adsorption is required for co-adsorption of an effective polyether suppressor layer. Co-adsorption involves factors from the multiplicity of halide-polyether binding sites, 24 to halide perturbation of interface water structure that makes it more hydrophobic favoring polyether adsorption, 28 to a possible role of Cu + as an ether-halide binding agent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 – 8 Halide adsorption by itself leads to acceleration of the copper deposition rate while polyether co-adsorption on the halide adlayer gives rise to significant inhibition of copper deposition by limiting access of Cu 2+ aq to the metal surface. 1 – 26 Electroanalytical, 1 – 26 gravimetric microbalance, 14 , 15 ellipsometry 18 and vibrational spectroscopy 27 , 28 studies unambiguously demonstrate that halide adsorption is required for co-adsorption of an effective polyether suppressor layer. Co-adsorption involves factors from the multiplicity of halide-polyether binding sites, 24 to halide perturbation of interface water structure that makes it more hydrophobic favoring polyether adsorption, 28 to a possible role of Cu + as an ether-halide binding agent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…3,5,8,16 Additional and/or alternative avenues proposed for disruption of the halide-polymer suppressor layer include reduction of a Cu + halide-ether binding agent, 9,11,17 potential driven order-disorder transitions in the underlying halide adlayer 31 and disruption of the polymer adsorption process by the metal deposition process itself. 1,4,[21][22][23][24][25][26] The filling process is also known to be quite sensitive to the initial conditions. 1,3,5,6 Quantitative linkage of electroanalytical measurements, processing and feature filling is presently a topic of significant interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid deactivation feature can be seen as large hysteretic voltammetric behavior characterized by an S-shaped negative differential resistance (S-NDR) by Moffat et al 18 Although cyclic voltammetry has been widely used in additive studies, [19][20][21][22][23][24] interpretation of the results is not easy because adsorption occurs at the same time as deactivation in conventional experimental arrangements. Accordingly, we constructed a microfluidic device in which rapid switching of the plating solution is enabled.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,34,42,43 Suggested mechanisms for suppression breakdown include reduction of a Cu + halide-ether binding agent, [26][27][28] potential driven order-disorder transitions in the halide adlayer, 46 and disruption of the polymer adsorption process by the metal deposition process itself that, amongst other variants, can involve a change in the hydrophilicity of the interface. 12,24,[39][40][41]44,47,48 Significant research is underway to link electroanalytical results with metallurgical and spectroscopic measurements of deposit microstructure and residual additive components incorporated in the growing deposit both during and following suppression breakdown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%