2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper(II) determination by using carbon paste electrode modified with molecularly imprinted polymer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the proposed MCPE is not interfered strongly by other metals and the detection limit of 0.34 allows the determination of copper in various matrixes. Table 3 shows the comparison of the performance characteristics of the proposed sensor with those of the best previously prepared copper sensors [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. The figure of merit of the proposed method is better or comparable than/to the other reported methods (see Table 3) and additionally, the method has the advantage of high selectivity and environment-friendly property.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Therefore, the proposed MCPE is not interfered strongly by other metals and the detection limit of 0.34 allows the determination of copper in various matrixes. Table 3 shows the comparison of the performance characteristics of the proposed sensor with those of the best previously prepared copper sensors [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. The figure of merit of the proposed method is better or comparable than/to the other reported methods (see Table 3) and additionally, the method has the advantage of high selectivity and environment-friendly property.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Until now, this combination has been used only for the determination of La and Ce [12], Pb [13][14][15], Cu [16,17], Hg [18][19][20] and Cd [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Cu (II) is a metal ion that is widespread in aquatic systems and an indispensable element at trace level to keep the metabolism of the human body, which is also toxic at high concentration . The United States Environmental Protection Agnency (USEPA) and World Health Organization (WHO) have set the safety limit of Cu (II) in potable water with 2.05×10 −5 mol/L and 1.57–3.15×10 −5 mol/L . For the above reason evaluating the concentration of Cu (II) with high selective and enhancement sensitivity is one of the most attractive, yet‐unrealized goals in many biological systems and industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%