The title compound H 2 L(CuCl 3 H 2 O)Cl (H 2 L = 1-(4′-pyridinium)pyridin-4-ol-ium), 1) was synthesized and investigated structurally and magnetically as well as via a first-principles, bottom-up theoretical analysis of the potential magnetic superexchange pathways. Compound 1 can be described structurally as a well-isolated, distorted 2D-honeycomb lattice with two potential exchange pathways: a dimeric interaction via hydrogen-bonded pairs of (CuCl 3 H 2 O) ions and a chain structure via bridging chloride ions. Surprisingly, the experimental magnetic data are best fitted using both a simple dimer model with a Curie− Weiss correction for interdimer exchange (J dimer = −107.4(1) K, θ = −1.22(4) K) and a strong-rung ladder model (J rung = −105.8(7) K, J rail = 2(7) K). Theoretical analysis at the UB3LYP/6-31+G(d) level supports the strong exchange observed through the [CuCl 4 (H 2 O)] 2− dimer moiety superexchange pathway (−102 K = −71 cm −1 ). However, the apparent vanishingly small exchange through the single halide bridge is merely a brute average of competing ferromagnetic (FM) (+24.8 K = +17.0 cm −1 ) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) (−21.0 K = −14.6 cm −1 ) exchange interactions. Our computational study shows that these fitting parameters carry no physical meaning since a honeycomb plaquette must be taken as magnetic building block for 1. The competition between FM and AFM pair interactions leads to geometrical frustration in 1 and could induce interesting magnetic response at low temperatures, if the magnetic exchange is adequately tuned by modifying substituents in ligands and, in turn, interactions within the crystal packing.