Whole cells of Nocardia corallina B-276 catalyse the stereoselective epoxygenation of alkenes to chiral epoxides. The bacterium expresses an enzyme, alkene monooxygenase, which catalyses the epoxygenation reaction stereoselectively. The enzyme consists of a terminal oxygenase (epoxygenase), an NADH-dependent reductase (reductase) and a regulatory component (coupling protein).The epoxygenase component contains a bridged diiron centre similar to that found in the hydroxylase component of soluble methane monooxygenase. Sequence-alignment modelling, supported by chemical modification and fluorescence probing, identified a hydrophobic oxygen/substrate binding site within the epoxygenase. The diiron centre was coordinated by the two His and two Glu residues from two conserved Glu-Xaa-Xaa-His sequences and by two further Glu residues. Molecular docking of substrates and products into the proposed active-site model of the epoxygenase suggested that Ala91 and Ala185 were responsible for the stereoselectivity exerted by AMO. It is proposed that these residues clamped the intermediate and/or product of the reaction, thereby controlling the configuration of the epoxide produced. In soluble methane monooxygenase these residues are replaced by two Gly residues which do not provide sufficient steric hindrance to prevent rotation of the intermediate in the active site and, therefore, the product of the reaction catalysed by this enzyme is achiral.Keywords : monooxygenase ; diiron ; epoxide ; stereoselective ; molecular docking.Prior to the crystallisation of the hydroxylase component of placed in soluble MMO by smaller residues (Cys151, Thr213, Ile217) allowing the binding of methane as well as molecular soluble methane monooxygenase, sequence-alignment modelling was used to predict the three-dimensional structure of the oxygen. This difference demonstrated that, although the two diiron proteins had similar iron coordination chemistry, modificaprotein. In that instance, molecular alignment of the hydroxylase to the three-dimensional structure of the R2 subunit of ribonu-tions in the residues surrounding the diiron cluster could be responsible for the observed differences in catalysis. cleotide reductase was performed in order to predict the structure of the hydroxylase active site [1]. In both proteins the diiron George et al.[4] used molecular dynamics calculations to determine the docking of substrate molecules into the crystal centre is coordinated by two conserved Glu-Xaa-Xaa-His sequences. Despite this similarity, the hydroxylase of soluble structure of the hydroxylase component of soluble MMO to determine the topology of the substrate binding site. By energy methane monooxygenase (MMO) and the R2 subunit of ribonucleotide reductase differ in their function in that R2 can only minimisation of the compounds into a rigid hydroxylase structure at 1500 K, several potential active sites were identified. bind oxygen whereas the hydroxylase can also bind organic subFrom the minimum energy functions for these sites three potenstra...