2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2013.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper sulfate as draw solute in forward osmosis desalination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhao and Zou [47] showed that when the solution against the membrane support layer had a lower aqueous diffusivity but higher viscosity, the ICP phenomenon will be more severe, resulting in lower water flux. According to Alnaizy et al [29], the experimental water flux was observed to be 7 times lower than the ideal water flux. Similarly, reverse salt flux increased slightly when the draw solution concentration was increased because of the increased amount of free Na þ ions in the draw solution.…”
Section: Effect Of Various Na 3 Po 4 Concentrations On Water Flux Andmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhao and Zou [47] showed that when the solution against the membrane support layer had a lower aqueous diffusivity but higher viscosity, the ICP phenomenon will be more severe, resulting in lower water flux. According to Alnaizy et al [29], the experimental water flux was observed to be 7 times lower than the ideal water flux. Similarly, reverse salt flux increased slightly when the draw solution concentration was increased because of the increased amount of free Na þ ions in the draw solution.…”
Section: Effect Of Various Na 3 Po 4 Concentrations On Water Flux Andmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, monovalent salts (NaCl, KCl, KBr, KNO 3 , NH 4 Cl, KHCO 3 , NaHCO 3 , NH 4 HCO 3 ) with favorable water solubility are frequently used, but the greatest disadvantage of using these salts as a draw solution for FO is the extremely high salt leakage (reverse salt flux reached 29.2 g/m 2 h when using 0.88 M KBr as a draw solution) [25][26][27]. To overcome this problem, divalent (CaSO 4 , MgSO 4 , CuSO 4 , MgCl 2 , CaCl 2 ) and trivalent salts (Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 , EDTA-2Na) were proposed as draw solutions [26,[28][29][30]. Compared with monovalent salts, the reverse salt fluxes of divalent and trivalent salts were lower because of the larger hydrated radius and higher electrostatic repulsion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membrane exhibits a salt rejection of over 95% [84,90] and has a water permeability coefficient (A) of 3.07 × 10 −12 ms −1 Pa −1 [84]. Since its development and availability, many researchers have used the membrane for FO desalination [18,84,90,128,129]. However, researchers have also synthesized FO membranes in the laboratory a summary of which is provided in Table 1 .…”
Section: Membrane Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Alnaizy et al used the method of metathesis precipitation to separate the draw solute from pure product water without using energy. In their studies, two draw solutes, copper sulfate [128] and magnesium sulfate [129], were used to desalinate brackish and seawater. Schematic diagram for the FO desalination method utilizing copper sulfate draw solution is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Precipitation Draw Solute Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last few years, most studies have investigated the used of inorganic salts as draw solutions due to their low cost and high osmotic pressure potential, which creates a high water flux (Achilli et al, 2010;Alnaizy et al, 2013). However, the low charge and small hydrated radius of monovalent and divalent ions in the draw solution can result in a high reverse flux of salts, such as 0.6 M NaCl (J s = 7.2 GMH), 0.6 M NH 4 HCO 3 (J s = 18.2 GMH), or 0.5 M MgCl 2 (J s = 5.6 GMH), when deionized (DI) water was used as the feed solution (Kiriukhin and Collins, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%