2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2018.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coproduct for Yangians of affine Kac–Moody algebras

Abstract: Given an affine Kac-Moody algebra g and its associated Yangian Y (g), we explain how to construct a coproduct for Y (g). In order to prove that this coproduct is an algebra homomorphism, we obtain, in the first half of this paper, a minimalistic presentation of Y (g) when g is, more generally, a symmetrizable Kac-Moody algebra.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems likely that by appropriately incorporating the full Cartan into the definition of Yμ ( c.f. [, Definition 2.1] ) , we could avoid having to choose between generators Aifalse(pfalse) and Hifalse(qfalse).…”
Section: Truncated Shifted Yangians and Klr Yangian Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems likely that by appropriately incorporating the full Cartan into the definition of Yμ ( c.f. [, Definition 2.1] ) , we could avoid having to choose between generators Aifalse(pfalse) and Hifalse(qfalse).…”
Section: Truncated Shifted Yangians and Klr Yangian Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we defineŝl N = sl N ⊗ C t, t −1 ⊕ Cc without the degree operator. In [6], the Yangian Y (g) of affine type is defined to be an algebra containing the degree operator d and one without d is denoted by Y (g ). In particular, the algebra defined in Definition 2.1 coincides with Y ,ε (g ) in the notation of [6, Definition 7.1].…”
Section: Affine Yangianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A formula for the coproduct on the affine Yangian Y ŝ l N was stated in [5]. Guay-Nakajima-Wendlandt [6] gave a detailed proof of the well-definedness. To recall it, we consider a bigger algebra Y ŝ l N ⊕ Cd , which is generated by x ± i,r , h i,r , d with defining relations given in [6, equation (2.8)].…”
Section: Coproductmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One way of seeing this is to appeal to the proof of [GRW4, Theorem 2.6]. A careful reading of that proof together with [GNW,3(ii)] shows that if g ≇ sl 2 then the relation (3.4) can be omitted and the relation (3.3) can even be replaced with the relation…”
Section: The Yangian Of a Simple Lie Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%