2022
DOI: 10.1017/s1744137422000078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coproduction and the crafting of cognitive institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract: In response to Paniagua and Rayamajhee's (2021) proposal for a polycentric approach for pandemic governance, Frolov (2022) notes that their paper focuses on preventive measures, and neglects the deeper, cognitive dimension of coproduction. In this essay, we extend the notion of coproduction to analyze the cognitive institutions that underlie social behavior during a pandemic. We analyze the role of coproduction and polycentricity in the emergence and persistence of shared mental models, including counterproduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this process is in its early stages and needs to be more assertive. Recent empirical literature related to the COVID-19 pandemic highlights that co-production is essential to the design of cognitive institutions as it acknowledges the central role of citizens in polycentric governance, whether they advance or undermine its goals (Frolov, 2022; Rayamajhee and Paniagua, 2022). In our empirical investigation, citizens are catalysts for institutional arrangements.…”
Section: Discussion: Public Policy-making In the Light Of The Reconfi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this process is in its early stages and needs to be more assertive. Recent empirical literature related to the COVID-19 pandemic highlights that co-production is essential to the design of cognitive institutions as it acknowledges the central role of citizens in polycentric governance, whether they advance or undermine its goals (Frolov, 2022; Rayamajhee and Paniagua, 2022). In our empirical investigation, citizens are catalysts for institutional arrangements.…”
Section: Discussion: Public Policy-making In the Light Of The Reconfi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 For more on the "packageability" of public goods and services, see Rayamajhee and Paniagua [2021], especially section 3.3.…”
Section: Diagnostics: Steelmanning Coextensivismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important implication of the above analysis is that commons governance requires inputs and "buy-in" from participants [25]. This holds true not only for common pool resource management, but also for the governance of global environmental externalities, climatic disasters, and pandemics [26][27][28]. Thus, although a narrow set of externalities may require some centralization, it comes at a steep cost of an increased probability of reducing citizen input [29].…”
Section: The Tragedy Of Nurdles?mentioning
confidence: 99%