2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-020-01242-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coprolite research: archaeological and paleoenvironmental potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Pearsall (2015:219) notes, it does not seem possible to recover organic and inorganic microfossils in a simultaneous procedure (i.e., without splitting into subsamples with different treatments). Because of this, most coprolite research today uses a variation of the sequential approach originally developed by Bryant and expanded upon by Pearsall and others (Blong and Shillito, 2021).…”
Section: Review Of Previous Coprolite Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Pearsall (2015:219) notes, it does not seem possible to recover organic and inorganic microfossils in a simultaneous procedure (i.e., without splitting into subsamples with different treatments). Because of this, most coprolite research today uses a variation of the sequential approach originally developed by Bryant and expanded upon by Pearsall and others (Blong and Shillito, 2021).…”
Section: Review Of Previous Coprolite Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coprolites (desiccated or mineralized feces) are increasingly recognized as important archives of paleoecological, paleontological, and archeological data (Reinhard and Bryant, 1992;Shillito et al, 2020a;Blong and Shillito, 2021). Coprolites are unique archives in that they represent a short-term record of an individual organism's diet and environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%