2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1866569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copula Representation of Bivariate L-Moments: A New Estimation Method for Multiparameter 2-Dimensional Copula Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that, if two consecutive values in a time series are chosen for small time lag k (day), these two values are likely to be less correlated for high values but more correlated for low values, which leads to negative value of A 1 (k). This implies that the intrinsic temporal distribution of precipitation can be investigated based on this asymmetry, possibly with advanced asymmetry functions such as bivariate moments based on L-moments (Brahimi et al, 2015;Serfling and Xiao, 2007).…”
Section: Asymmetry and Catchment Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that, if two consecutive values in a time series are chosen for small time lag k (day), these two values are likely to be less correlated for high values but more correlated for low values, which leads to negative value of A 1 (k). This implies that the intrinsic temporal distribution of precipitation can be investigated based on this asymmetry, possibly with advanced asymmetry functions such as bivariate moments based on L-moments (Brahimi et al, 2015;Serfling and Xiao, 2007).…”
Section: Asymmetry and Catchment Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vector parameter θΘp,p1 of the copula family Cθ can be estimated using a nonparametric, semiparametric, or fully parametric approach. In this study, the focus is on the maximum pseudo‐likelihood (MPL) method, however, other estimation methods may be applied, for instance the moment method based on the inversion of dependence measures such as the Spearman's rho and Kendall's tau [ Nelsen , ], minimum‐distance method [ Tsukahara , ], inference function for margins method [ Joe and Xu , ], and method based on bivariate L‐moments [ Brahimi et al ., ]. The MPL estimator is determined by maximizing the log pseudo‐likelihood function: l(θ)=i=1nlogcθ(trueÛi1,trueÛi2), where trueÛij=Rij/(n+1) are pseudo‐observations ( R ij is the rank of X ij among (X1j,,Xnj)) and c(u,v)=C(u,v)uv is the corresponding copula density that is absolutely continuous.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar line of study, Brahimi et al . [] introduced a new L ‐moment‐based approach to estimate the copula parameters, which outperforms the traditional approaches in terms of bias and computational costs, and is less sensitive to data outliers. However, these methods are not usually capable of characterizing the underlying uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Local optimization approaches benefit from efficient (mostly gradient-based) search algorithms, but suffer from susceptibility to getting trapped in local optima [Duan et al, 1992]. In a similar line of study, Brahimi et al [2015] introduced a new L-moment-based approach to estimate the copula parameters, which outperforms the traditional approaches in terms of bias and computational costs, and is less sensitive to data outliers. However, these methods are not usually capable of characterizing the underlying uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%