Copycats vs. Original Mobile Apps: A Machine Learning Copycat-Detection Method and Empirical Analysis

Abstract

While the growth of the mobile apps market has created significant market opportunities and economic incentives for mobile app developers to innovate, it has also inevitably invited other developers to create rip-offs. Practitioners and developers of original apps claim that copycats steal the original app’s idea and potential demand, and have called for app platforms to take action against such copycats. Surprisingly, however, there has been little rigorous research analyzing whether and how copycats affect an original app’s demand. The primary deterrent to such research is the lack of an objective way to identify whether an app is a copycat or an original. Using a combination of machine learning techniques such as natural language processing, latent semantic analysis, network-based clustering, and image analysis, we propose a method to identify apps as original or copycat and detect two types of copycats: deceptive and nondeceptive. Based on the detection results, we conduct an econometric analysis to determine the impact of copycat apps on the demand for the original apps on a sample of 10,100 action game apps by 5,141 developers that were released in the iOS App Store over five years. Our results indicate that the effect of a specific copycat on an original app’s demand is determined by the quality and level of deceptiveness of the copycat. High-quality nondeceptive copycats negatively affect demand for the originals. By contrast, low-quality, deceptive copycats positively affect demand for the originals. Results indicate that in aggregate the impact of copycats on the demand of original mobile apps is statistically insignificant. Our study contributes to the growing literature on mobile app consumption by presenting a method to identify copycats and providing evidence of the impact of copycats on an original app’s demand. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0735 .

Friends or foes? Examining platform owners’ entry into complementors’ spaces

“…Wen and Zhu () examine Google’s introduction of its own mobile apps for its Android system. Similar to Wang, Li, and Vir Singh (), they find that in each of the three entry events they studied, there are a large number of third‐party apps offering similar features. Because Google’s entry makes these markets less attractive for app developers, its entry pushes these app developers to innovate in other product spaces, which may reduce wasted efforts in developing these duplicate apps.…”

The effects of product development network positions on product performance and confidentiality performance

“…In the same industry context, Massimino et al (2017) found that being located in a geographical area with many same-industry firms improved confidentiality; this finding, however, omits the impact of inter-organizational networks. Our study implies a need for heightened sensitivity to the dual nature of information and knowledge exposure (Niculescu, Wu, & Xu, 2018;Wang, Li, & Singh, 2018). Our second contribution relates to the understanding of structural holes during product development activities.…”

Revisiting Location in a Digital Age: How Can Lead Markets Accelerate the Internationalization of Mobile Apps?

“…This is not possible unless the digital firm deploys sufficient technological capabilities for creatively combining a huge variety of software components to upgrade the technology on multiple fronts. However, once a digital firm deploys adequate technological capabilities to evolve a technology as per the requirements of a heterogeneous lead market, the resulting technology may be difficult to imitate, which offers a lasting advantage against copycat apps and local clones across countries (Shaheer and Li 2020; Wang, Li, and Singh 2018).…”