2023
DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cor Triatriatum: A Review

Katherine Kilkenny,
William Frishman

Abstract: Cor triatriatum is a rare congenital cardiac anomaly, characterized by a fibromuscular partition dividing the left (cor triatriatum sinister) or, rarely, the right atrium (cor triatriatum dexter). Occurring in 0.1–0.4% of congenital heart disease cases, it exhibits diverse clinical presentations, often mimicking mitral stenosis and left-sided heart failure, while occasionally remaining asymptomatic into adulthood. The embryological origin of cor triatriatum remains controversial. Recent years have seen the eme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cor triatriatum is an uncommon congenital cardiac anomaly, comprising 0.1-0.4% of congenital heart diseases. This condition is identified by the unique feature of the left or right atrium being split into two separate chambers due to the presence of an abnormal fibromuscular membrane [1,2]. The more common left-sided variant, CTS often coexists with other congenital heart defects such as atrial septal defects, patent foramen ovale, or left-sided superior vena cava [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cor triatriatum is an uncommon congenital cardiac anomaly, comprising 0.1-0.4% of congenital heart diseases. This condition is identified by the unique feature of the left or right atrium being split into two separate chambers due to the presence of an abnormal fibromuscular membrane [1,2]. The more common left-sided variant, CTS often coexists with other congenital heart defects such as atrial septal defects, patent foramen ovale, or left-sided superior vena cava [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%