2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cord Blood Unit Dominance Analysis and Effect of the Winning Unit on Outcomes after Double-Unit Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Adults with Acute Leukemia: A Retrospective Study on Behalf of Eurocord, the Cord Blood Committee of Cellular Therapy, Immunobiology Working Party, and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Abstract: Usually, after double umbilical cord blood transplantation (DUCBT), only 1 of the transplanted units persists in the long term. The characteristics of the winning cord blood unit (W-CBU) that determine unit dominance and how they influence the outcomes of DUCBT remain unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 347 patients with acute leukemia transplanted with a DUCBT (694 CBU) from 2005 to 2013 who had documented neutrophil engraftment and a W-CBU identified by chimerism analysis, to identify unit characteristics i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, previous analyses seldom focused on HLA matching between the "loser" unit and the recipient [30]. Overall, the MHMA algorithm should be helpful in predicting whether higher-degree HLA mismatching improves outcomes in terms of relapse and NRM rates [18,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Notably, previous analyses seldom focused on HLA matching between the "loser" unit and the recipient [30]. Overall, the MHMA algorithm should be helpful in predicting whether higher-degree HLA mismatching improves outcomes in terms of relapse and NRM rates [18,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 100-day cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD were 50.5% (95% CI, 40.2% to 59.9%) and 28.9% (95% CI, 20.2% to 38.1%), respectively, in the cord-haplo group and 51.2% (95% CI, 35.2% to 65.2%) and 31.7% (95% CI, 18.3% to 46.0%), respectively, in the haplo group (P = .683 and .662, respectively) ( Figure 2A and B). The 1-year cumulative incidences of overall and extensive chronic GVHD were 33.0% (95% CI, 23.9% to 42.4%) and 18.6% (95% CI, 11.6% to 26.9%), respectively, in the cord-haplo group and 35.7% (95% CI, 21.7% to 49.9%) and 16.7% (95% CI, 7.3% to 29.3%), respectively, in the haplo group (P = .794 and .976, respectively) ( Figure 2C and D).…”
Section: Gvhdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In first trials, however, this approach did not result in a faster hematopoietic reconstitution compared with single‐unit cord blood transplants, but rather led to poorer platelet reconstitution and greater incidences of both acute and chronic GvHD . Interestingly, only one of two competing cord blood units has been shown to contribute to long‐term hematopoiesis in the recipient but the factors that determine superiority of the dominant cord blood unit remained so far obscure . One factor affecting the transplantation outcome in this setting was the extent of HLA mismatch between the two units .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%