2020
DOI: 10.2113/2020/9406113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cordilleran Subduction Initiation: Retroarc Timing and Basinal Response in the Inyo Mountains, Eastern California

Abstract: Subduction zones drive plate tectonics on Earth, yet subduction initiation and the related upper plate depositional and structural kinematics remain poorly understood because upper plate records are rare and often strongly overprinted by magmatism and deformation. During the late Paleozoic time, Laurentia’s western margin was truncated by a sinistral strike-slip fault that transformed into a subduction zone. Thick Permian strata in the Inyo Mountains of central-eastern California record this transition. Two ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(139 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses that are >10% normally discordant or 5% reversely discordant or are spuriously young are listed in Table 1 as "rejected grains" and are not used in the overall age determinations (cf. Lodes et al 2020;Dobbs et al 2021). We used the TuffZirc algorithm in Isoplot (Ludwig, 2003) to assess likely crystallisation ages for the two units (Figs.…”
Section: Geochronology: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses that are >10% normally discordant or 5% reversely discordant or are spuriously young are listed in Table 1 as "rejected grains" and are not used in the overall age determinations (cf. Lodes et al 2020;Dobbs et al 2021). We used the TuffZirc algorithm in Isoplot (Ludwig, 2003) to assess likely crystallisation ages for the two units (Figs.…”
Section: Geochronology: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…260 Ma andesites of the Goler Formation that were deposited in proximity to the nascent Sierra-Mojave arc (e.g., metasedimentary rocks of Holland Camp; Martin and Walker, 1995;Carr et al, 1997;Rains et al, 2012;Macdonald, 2016). Inboard of the nascent arc, locally derived carbonate and siliciclastic detritus was deposited in the Darwin and Lone Pine Basins, which developed in response to transpressional tectonics (Stevens et al, 2015;Lodes et al, 2020). Particularly relevant to this tectonic discussion is the regional juxtaposition of lower Paleozoic, relatively deep-water strata of the central and southern El Paso terrane against Neoproterozoic-lower Paleozoic, shallow-water, passive-margin strata, because the deposition of the Devonian and younger rocks in the El Paso terrane may have postdated terrane emplacement (Poole et al, 1992).…”
Section: Strata Of the El Paso Mountainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lone Pine and Darwin basins formed in response to this thrusting, which we attribute to interplay between the waning sinistral transpressive regime extending from the north and the waxing subduction zone developing to the south. Siliciclastic turbidites of the Lone Pine Formation may have received siliciclastic debris from the adjacent Conglomerate Mesa Uplift, a SW-NE-trending transpressional antiform formed in response to sinistral-oblique convergence (Stevens et al, 2015;Lodes et al, 2020). Southeast of Conglomerate Mesa, the Darwin Basin also received debris from the Bird Spring carbonate shelf located immediately to the east.…”
Section: Late Paleozoic To Permian Geologic Evolution Of East-central...mentioning
confidence: 99%