2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033441
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core competencies in neurocritical care training in China: consensus developed by a national Delphi consensus survey combined with nominal group technique

Abstract: ObjectivesTo define the core competencies essential for specialist training in neurocritical care in China.DesignModified Delphi method and nominal group (NG) technique.SettingNational.ParticipantsA total of 1094 respondents from 33 provinces in China participated in the online survey. A NG of 11 members was organised by the Neuro-Critical Care Committee affiliated with the Chinese Association of Critical Care Physicians and the National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Neurological Diseases.Results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations to this prioritisation process are often used in research to fit the purpose and setting of a specific study, which is called a modified NGT 47–50 . We chose individual online prioritisation of the design principles after finishing the third focus group session 51–56 . We performed multiple focus group sessions with a combination of the modified NGT method as the one described by Seidel and the one described by Søndergaard 49,50 (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Variations to this prioritisation process are often used in research to fit the purpose and setting of a specific study, which is called a modified NGT 47–50 . We chose individual online prioritisation of the design principles after finishing the third focus group session 51–56 . We performed multiple focus group sessions with a combination of the modified NGT method as the one described by Seidel and the one described by Søndergaard 49,50 (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47][48][49][50] We chose individual online prioritisation of the design principles after finishing the third focus group session. [51][52][53][54][55][56] We performed multiple focus group sessions with a combination of the modified NGT method as the one described by Seidel and the one described by Søndergaard 49,50 (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Secondary Care Physicianmentioning
confidence: 99%